哪裡有電影的英文影評

1. 英文影評有哪些

一、原文：

First - what this movie is NOT - it is not "deep", "meaningful" or "moving".

What this movie was to us is great physical comedy, with a great balance between "realistic" characters (as realistic as two-dimensional comic characters ever are), outstanding animal training, good voicing (no, its not Shrek, but it all moves together smoothly and Bill Murray is "spot on"), and best of all.

a great series of pratfalls, chases, falls, and scenes that kept my 11 year old son jumping and laughing for the whole 80 minutes.

Its also very nicely balanced from a parent's perspective. I found nothing "embarrassing to watch", "hard to explain" or "out of age group." The bad guys are not "scary-bad", but funny bad.

"High Risk" situations won't scare a young child, but carry the plot forward, and gave me plenty to chuckle (and sometimes laugh out loud) about.

The baking Lasagna scene is wonderful for anyone who cooks with their children.In short, this was a great family movie that we all enjoyed.

二、翻譯：

首先，這部電影不是」深刻」」有意義」或」感人」。這部電影對我們來說是一部偉大的身體喜劇，在「現實主義」的角色(像平面漫畫角色一樣真實) ，傑出的動物訓練，優秀的配音(不是史萊克，但它一起平穩地移動，比爾 · 默里是「點」) ，最棒的是，一系列偉大的跌倒，追逐，跌倒，場景讓我11歲的兒子跳躍和笑了整整80分鍾。

從父母的角度來看，這也非常好地平衡了。我沒發現」看起來很尷尬」」很難解釋」或者」不合適齡」壞人不是」可怕的壞人」而是有趣的壞人。

「高風險」的情節不會嚇到小孩子，但是情節會繼續發展下去，讓我有很多時間可以笑(有時還會大聲笑)。烤千層面的場景對任何一個和孩子一起做飯的人來說都是很棒的。

(1)哪裡有電影的英文影評擴展閱讀

1、電影名稱，拍攝地點，導演及演員名字。

2、電影內容簡介（一般不透露結局）。

3、對該電影的評價+電影優點（最吸引的劇情，比如劇情跌宕起伏，演員演技好）。

4、觀點+電影的缺陷（比如結尾過於倉促、特技不夠逼真）。

2. 英語影評

哈利波特影評
Harry Potter is a series of seven fantasy novels written by British author J. K. Rowling. The books chronicle the adventures of the eponymous adolescent wizard Harry Potter, together with Ron Weasley and Hermione Granger, his best friends. The central story arc concerns Harry's struggle against the evil wizard Lord Voldemort, who killed Harry's parents in his quest to conquer the wizarding world, after which he seeks to subjugate the Muggle (non-magical) world to his rule.

後天影評
Today, we watched a movie, the name of this movie was called:The day after tomorrow.What this movie speaks BE:A world happened to become cold affairs in the world,What to broadcast it is an etc. the region temperature nasty play in New York to descend in the movie, is almost each to descend more than ten degree.The sky still descends terrible hail, also having more afraid of of
Tornado, city in New York became to break city for an instant after being cut through by tornado, making the whole city become more without results one.
This really lets the person touch eyes shocking, make the person's heart can't fall calm once in a very long while, although exaggerate very in the movie, but we now not just so:world become warm...So ask the classmates to rise from the do-it-yourself, environmental protection, make our environments more beautiful!

阿凡達影評
Avatar is directed by James Cameron. The two main characters are Jake Sully, played by Sam Worthington, and Neytiri, played by Zoe Saldana.
Clones named Avatars are sent to Pandora Planet to persuade people there to leave the planet so that human beings can exploit a rare mineral. Jake is sent there to control his Avatar. However, he comes across Neytiri and they fall in love with each other. Jake begins to see that nature and the planet should be protected. At last he and the people there work together to defeat human beings and send them back to the earth.
3D technology and the beautiful natural scenery are the two highlights of the film. The message of the film is simple — human beings should protect nature and live in harmony with it.

阿甘正傳影評
Forrest Gump is so unique because of the character Forrest Gump himself, who has a low IQ of only 75. I love that Forrest doesn't lose his innocence and purity throughout the movie, or maybe he just can't but either way, this shows you don't need to be evil or really intelligent to be recognised or successful. It is just a movie, so maybe it doesn't work like that in reality. What that simply means is that the acting and story of this film was incredibly touching on a real level. And in my definition that's what a good movie should be able to do.

譯文：

哈利波特影評
哈利·波特是一系列的書面由英國作家JK羅琳7奇幻小說。這些書紀事同名青少年精靈哈利波特的冒險，與羅恩·韋斯萊和赫敏·格蘭傑，他最好的朋友在一起。中央故事弧關心哈利的對抗邪惡的巫師伏地魔，誰殺死了哈利的父母在他的追求征服魔法世界，之後他試圖征服麻瓜（非魔法）世界他的統治的斗爭。

後天影評
今天，我們看了一部電影，這部電影的名字叫：這部電影講明天就要後的一天：一個世界發生的事情變得冷漠事務，在世界上，什麼廣播它是一個等地區氣溫討厭玩在紐約電影下降，幾乎是每一個下降十餘degree.The天空仍然下降可怕的冰雹，也有更怕的
龍卷風，城市紐約成為打破城市瞬間通過龍卷風被切斷後，使得整個城市變得更加無果之一。
這確實讓人摸眼睛震撼，使人的心臟不能在很長一段時間下降冷靜一次，雖然很誇張的電影，但我們現在不只是如此：世界變得溫暖...所以要求同學從做自己動手，保護環境上升，使我們的環境更加美麗！

阿凡達影評
阿凡達是由詹姆斯·卡梅隆執導。兩位主角都是男主角，由薩姆·沃辛頓扮演，和奈提莉，由佐伊·索爾達娜扮演。
命名的化身克隆被發送到潘多拉星球說服那裡的人離開地球，使人類可以利用一個稀有礦產。傑克被送到那裡控制他的阿凡達。然而，他遇到奈提莉，他們愛上了對方。傑克開始看到大自然和地球應該受到保護。最後，他和那裡的人民一起打敗人類，並將其發送回地球。
3D技術和美麗的自然風光是兩大亮點的電影。影片的信息很簡單 - 人類應該保護自然，和睦相處吧。

阿甘正傳影評
阿甘是字元阿甘自己，誰也只有75一個低智商的，因為如此獨特。我喜歡阿甘並沒有失去他的天真和純潔進了電影，也許他只是不能，但無論哪種方式，這說明你並不需要是邪惡的還是真的聰明到被承認或成功。這只是一部電影，所以也許它不喜歡的工作在現實中。什麼是簡單的意思是，這部電影的演技和故事是令人難以置信的感人的真實水平。而在我的定義，這就是一部好電影應該是能夠做到的。
希望對你能有所幫助。

3. 求經典美國電影影評，最好是英文版的，中文也行，一個電影最好有多個影評 發776900490，非常感謝了

網上資源很多的，列舉兩個~
《肖申克的救贖》的英文影評 版本二郵件發給你

Though adapted from a Stephen King novella, "The Shawshank Redemption" has more to do with a man's internal demons than the kind that routinely rise up from overgrown graveyards. Like "Stand by Me," it's not a typical story from the horror King. Instead, it's a devoutly old-fashioned, spiritually uplifting prison drama about two lifers who must break their emotional shackles before they can finally become free men.

Set in a spooky old penitentiary with turrets and towers, the movie manages to be true to its Big House origins while incorporating such horrific mainstays as the clanking of chains and the creaking of the walls. There's even a raven that roosts in the prison library, where he is cared for by a darling old trusty (James Whitmore). For the most part, however, the movie expands upon cliches that date back to James Cagney's prison portraits梩he twisted warden (Bob Gunton) and the sadistic guard (Clancy Brown).

Director Frank Darabont, who apprenticed on B-scripts ("The Fly II") and TV movies ("Buried Alive"), manages to fashion an improbable new pattern from the same old material in his remarkable debut. While he deals with the grimmest aspects of prison life (sadistic guards, gang rapes and befouled food), Darabont is chiefly interested in the 20-year friendship that sustains Andy (Tim Robbins) and Red (Morgan Freeman) .

The movie opens in 1947 as Andy, a prominent New England banker, is on trial for murdering his wife and her lover. Not only did he have a motive, but he had the opportunity梙is footprints were found at the scene of the crime梐nd he had a weapon of the caliber used in the shootings. He insists that he is innocent, but the jury finds him guilty. Sentenced to life twice over, Andy is shipped to the maximum-security state prison at Shawshank, Maine. An introverted loner with an interest in reading, chess and rock carving, Andy doesn't make himself many friends until Red, a 30-year-veteran of the system, decides to take him under his wing.

Things begin to change for the better when Andy finds a way to use his skills and ecation to benefit his fellow felons. When he overhears the guard captain complaining about losing most of an inheritance to taxes, he offers to trade his advice for three beers for each of the men who are working with him that day tarring the roof.

His reputation as a financial adviser spreads, and soon he is doing the taxes for all the guards and running the warden's outside scams. This leads to a position in the tiny prison library, which Andy graally expands into the best ecational facility of its kind in the area. It takes him six years to do it, but Andy never gives up hope.

It is hope that allows the self-proclaimed innocent man to survive what may or may not be an unjust imprisonment. And hope is his gift to his friend Red, who no longer even tries to impress the parole board at his hearings. He's become "institutionalized," he explains to Andy, and would be a "nobody" on the outside.

Red's gift to Andy is absolution when he finally confesses his true sins. Whether or not he pulled the trigger, Andy blames himself for causing his wife's death; his redemption comes as he learns to give of himself over the course of this marvelously acted and directed film.

Robbins gives a performance that evolves with beautiful clarity from starchy banker to warm and loving friend. Freeman is sure to gain his third Oscar nomination for his portrayal of Red. He also reads the film's lovely narration, much of it drawn verbatim from King's 1982 novella.

A detailed portrait of the routine of cellblock life, "The Shawshank Redemption" might change a few minds about the usefulness of incarceration in terms of rehabilitation. Mostly, though, it reminds us of that we all hold the keys to our own prisons.

《楚門的世界》英文影評The Truman Show'' is founded on an enormous secret that all of the studio's advertising has been determined to reveal. I didn't know the secret when I saw the film, and was able to enjoy the little doubts and wonderings that the filmmakers so carefully planted. If by some good chance you do not know the secret, read no further.

Those fortunate audience members (I trust they have all left the room?) will be able to appreciate the meticulous way director Peter Weir and writer Andrew Niccol have constructed a jigsaw plot around their central character, who doesn't suspect that he's living his entire life on live television. Yes, he lives in an improbably ideal world, but I fell for that: I assumed the movie was taking a sitcom view of life, in which neighbors greet each other over white picket fences, and Ozzie and Harriet are real people.

Actually, it's Seaside, a planned community on the Gulf Coast near Tampa. Called Seahaven in the movie, it looks like a nice place to live. Certainly Truman Burbank (Jim Carrey) doesn't know anything else. You accept the world you're given, the filmmakers suggest; more thoughtful viewers will get the buried message, which is that we accept almost everything in our lives without examining it very closely. When was the last time you reflected on how really odd a tree looks? Truman works as a sales executive at an insurance company, is happily married to Meryl (Laura Linney), and doesn't find it suspicious that she describes household procts in the language of TV commercials. He is happy, in a way, but an uneasiness gnaws away at him. Something is missing, and he thinks perhaps he might find it in Fiji, where Lauren (Natascha McElhone), the only woman he really loved, allegedly has moved with her family.

Why did she leave so quickly? Perhaps because she was not a safe bet for Truman's world: The actress who played her (named Sylvia) developed real feeling and pity for Truman, and felt he should know the truth about his existence. Meryl, on the other hand, is a reliable pro (which raises the question, unanswered, of their sex life).

Truman's world is controlled by a TV procer named Christof (Ed Harris), whose control room is high in the artificial dome that provides the sky and horizon of Seahaven. He discusses his programming on talk shows, and dismisses the protests of those (including Sylvia) who believe Truman is the victim of a cruel deception. Meanwhile, the whole world watches Truman's every move, and some viewers even leave the TV on all night, as he sleeps.

The trajectory of the screenplay is more or less inevitable: Truman must graally realize the truth of his environment, and try to escape from it. It's clever the way he's kept on his island by implanted traumas about travel and water. As the story unfolds, however, we're not simply expected to follow it: We're invited to think about the implications. About a world in which modern communications make celebrity possible, and inhuman.

Until fairly recently, the only way you could become really famous was to be royalty, or a writer, actor, preacher or politician--and even then, most people had knowledge of you only through words or printed pictures.

Television, with its insatiable hunger for material, has made celebrities into ``content,'' devouring their lives and secrets. If you think ``The Truman Show'' is an exaggeration, reflect that Princess Diana lived under similar conditions from the day she became engaged to Charles.

Carrey is a surprisingly good choice to play Truman. We catch glimpses of his manic comic persona, just to make us comfortable with his presence in the character, but this is a well-planned performance; Carrey is on the right note as a guy raised to be liked and likable, who decides his life requires more risk and hardship. Like the angels in ``City of Angels,'' he'd like to take his chances.

Ed Harris also finds the right notes as Christof, the TV svengali. He uses the technospeak by which we distance ourselves from the real meanings of our words. (If TV procers ever spoke frankly about what they were really doing, they'd come across like Bulworth.) For Harris, the demands of the show take precedence over any other values, and if you think that's an exaggeration, tell it to the TV news people who broadcast that Los Angeles suicide.

I enjoyed ``The Truman Show'' on its levels of comedy and drama; I liked Truman in the same way I liked Forrest Gump--because he was a good man, honest, and easy to sympathize with.

But the underlying ideas made the movie more than just entertainment. Like ``Gattaca,'' the previous film written by Niccol, it brings into focus the new values that technology is forcing on humanity.

Because we can engineer genetics, because we can telecast real lives--of course we must, right? But are these good things to do? The irony is, the people who will finally answer that question will be the very ones proced by the process.
如果你找不到，還需要的話，歡迎繼續聯系

4. 誰有經典電影的英文影評

珍珠港的影評

pearl harbour film review

Pearl Harbor consists of three incongruous acts, mashed together into an ungainly whole. It appears to be more interested in reprocing the success of Titanic, which also set a fictional love story amidst a tragic historical event, than it is in telling the story of the men and women who fought and died in the attack on Pearl Harbor.
Titanic worked because the central characters were interesting, the story was cohesive, the historical events were handled respectfully and with the proper dramatic tone, and underneath it all was an intelligent reflection on the human failings that permitted such a tragedy in the first place.

Pearl Harbor reces the historical backdrop into a series of action set pieces. Instead of exploring ideas inherent in the events, it extracts them, recing the reason for Japan's attack to something inexplicable at best, and having utterly nothing to say about why the attack happened, how it was carried out, or how we responded. The film is dedicated to the men who died at Pearl Harbor, but what does it dedicate to them? It does not seem very interested in them except as a tool for dramatic imagery. Consider, for example, a scene in which we learn that men are trapped in a sunken ship in the harbor. We learn this to emphasize the brutality of the attack, as if such emphasis were needed. Then the film forgets this point entirely, providing the fates of those men in a narrated line just before the closing credits. Why wasn't the third act of the film about those men, instead of a rushed covering of the Doolittle raid on Tokyo, complete with overblown crash landings and an improbable engagement with Japanese soldiers?

If you want to see a real movie about Pearl Harbor or the Doolittle Raid, one that paints a deep and accurate picture of what it was like, one you can learn from, one that pays tribute to our veterans, or even just one that functions as convincing entertainment, there is no shortage of options. Tora! Tora! Tora! chronicles the events before, ring, and after the attack from both the American and Japanese sides. Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo is as thorough a chronicle of the Doolittle Raid as is probably possible in a feature film, while also following the personal stories of a few indivials involved (any one of which is more interesting than the personal story in Pearl Harbor). The Purple Heart, one of the most heartbreaking movies I've ever seen, tells the story of Americans captured by the Japanese after the raid.

Writing off the historical aspects of the film, I am left with the love triangle that makes up the entire first act and pervades the rest of it. It is wholly uninteresting. This same story has been told better, countless times before. Not one of the three characters is fleshed out into an indivial: they are bland stereotypes, dolled up to look pretty and given trite lines that they recite to convey the illusion of genuine emotion. It's telling that it doesn't much matter to us how the love triangle is resolved. Unless they both die, she'll get one of them, and who cares which? Neither of the men are personable, and we surely suspect early on that her decision will be based more on fate than her own volition anyway. (In plots like this, it's survival of the survivors.) And so, alas, we are denied even the most basic of all elements of storytelling, namely, characters making actual decisions

5. 英文電影影評100字

《阿凡達》影評：

Avatar is directed by James Cameron.The two main characters are Jake Sully,played by Sam Worthington,and Neytiri,played by Zoe Saldana.

Clones named Avatars are sent to Pandora Planet to persuade people there to leave the planet so that human beings can exploit a rare mineral.Jake is sent there to control his Avatar.

However,he comes across Neytiri and they fall in love with each other.Jake begins to see that nature and the planet should be protected.At last he and the people there work together to defeat human beings and send them back to the earth.

3D technology and the beautiful natural scenery are the two highlights of the film.The message of the film is simple—human beings should protect nature and live in harmony with it.

譯文

《阿凡達》由詹姆斯·卡梅隆執導，兩個主要角色是山姆·沃辛頓飾演的傑克·薩利和佐伊·薩爾達納飾演的奈提莉。

名為阿凡達的克隆人被送往潘多拉星球，勸說那裡的人們離開這個星球，這樣人類就可以開采一種稀有礦物。傑克被送往那裡控制他的阿凡達。

然而，他遇到了奈提莉，他們相愛了。傑克開始意識到大自然和地球應該得到保護。最後，他和那裡的人們一起努力打敗人類，把他們送回地球。

3D技術和美麗的自然風光是這部電影的兩大亮點。電影傳達的信息很簡單——人類應該保護自然，與自然和諧相處。

6. 拜託各位電影達人們：有哪些權威的英文影評網站

我最經常上的是

IMDB 這個你應該知道http://www.imdb.com/

爛番茄http://www.rottentomatoes.com/

林肯中心影片中心：http://www.filmlinc.com/

其他的你看下這個帖子
http://www.douban.com/note/19340696/

這兩個也不錯的
http://www.classicfilmguide.com/index.php?s=home
http://movie-gurus.com/content/reviews/a/index.html