英文電影穿條紋睡衣的男孩中的優秀句子

❶ 穿條紋睡衣的男孩的影評

如奧斯卡經典影片《辛德勒名單》、《鋼琴師》、《美麗人生》等等，但透過孩子的視角來展現此類主題還是頭一次。 透過孩子的視角來看世界無疑是獨特的，類似的作品有如《西西里的美麗傳說》。影片中通過一個情竇初開小男孩對女主角的窺視開始，一步步地展現那個時代中人物的悲歡離合，縱然解讀的異常「孩子氣」，但反差之下現實的殘酷才顯得更加驚心動魄。《穿條紋睡衣的男孩》同樣透過一個孩子的眼睛來講述二戰中德國集中營中的情景，以一個孩子的視角來審視那個特殊的年代。那些殺戮和令人難以直視的鮮血，在孩子的眼中被折射的是如此光陸怪離和有趣，但越是如此現實的殘酷就越是讓人心血尤滴！ 近些年來反映二戰納粹題材的電影有這樣一種傾向，從單純的反映德國納粹的殘暴與獸性轉而譴責戰爭對人性的傷害。主題也從單純地同情被納粹蹂躪的人們，轉而反映這樣的病態專權對所有善良人民的殘害——對德國人也是如此！在《鋼琴師》結尾，那位救助過主角和很多猶太人的德國軍官蜷縮在盟軍德國戰俘營里，那如寶石般碧藍的眼睛中寫滿了絕望！縱然他保有良知，冒著生命危險救助猶太人，但等待他的結局依然是屍骨無存！而在家中等待他歸來的妻子和三個孩子，最終連他們的父親和丈夫死在那裡都不知道！這，就是戰爭！ 正如二戰結束後德國總理在猶太人紀念碑前感天動地的一跪！殊不知他也是受害者！德國人也是受害者！ 為戰爭而瘋狂的永遠是沒有人性的禽獸，不論你站在哪一方！在戰爭中受傷的永遠是善良的大眾，不論你屬於哪一方！ 當影片中布魯諾在毒氣室中的牽起施穆爾的手的時候，我們就已經意識到和平是多美麗的一個字眼，原本世界就應該如兩個男孩間的友誼那麼簡單。不論是文化差異還是種族隔閡，都如兩個人之間那張鐵絲網一樣千瘡百孔，它阻止不了人們交流的進步。但當戰爭的槍口指向無辜的人們時，不論是怎樣的血統還是多麼被推崇的種族崇拜都比不過那一件條紋睡衣，結果都是鮮血淋漓。它將毫不留情地阻隔人類交流的進步，因為它滅絕的是人性！ 呼喚和平，不是說說那麼簡單，而是發自靈魂的吶喊！ 盡管有些不切實際的幻想，這部電影依舊是一部感人肺腑的佳作！ ——《泰晤士報》 《穿條紋睡衣的男孩》極其沉重的結尾將影片上升到了新的水平。 ——《獨立報》 馬克·赫曼透過孩子的眼睛來詮釋大屠殺事件，直到最終大結局的時候我們才被眼前美麗的悲劇驚呆了。 ——《衛報》 馬克·赫曼非常成功地將約翰·伯恩的原著改編後搬到了大銀幕上，片中強烈的情緒感染了所有人。 ——《天空衛視》 《穿條紋睡衣的男孩》以孩子的視角來批判大屠殺，問題在於現代觀眾理解起這些隱晦的批判會比較困難，因而這種手法是極其容易誤導觀眾的。 ——《斜向》雜志 《穿條紋睡衣的男孩》的主題試圖探尋關於人性的難題，然而卻將影片本身放在了搖擺不定的道德天平上。 ——《未來電影》 非常震撼的一部電影，令我們不得不重新審視那段戰爭的悲劇性。

❷ 誰能例舉一下《穿條紋睡衣的男孩》這部電影里的經典台詞（中文版的） 謝謝~

Childhood is measured out by sounds and smells and sights,before the dark hour of reason grows.
在黑暗的理性到來之前，用以丈量童年的是聽覺、嗅覺以及視覺。

❸ 《穿條紋睡衣的男孩》影評是什麼

《穿條紋睡衣的男孩》透過一個孩子的眼睛來講述二戰中德國集中營中的情景，以一個孩子的視角來審視那個特殊的年代。那些殺戮和令人難以直視的鮮血，在孩子的眼中被折射的是如此光陸怪離和有趣，但越是現實的殘酷就越是讓人心血尤滴。

《穿條紋睡衣的男孩》以孩子的視角來批判大屠殺，問題在於現代觀眾理解起這些隱晦的批判會比較困難，因而這種手法是極其容易誤導觀眾的。

內容介紹：

有一天布魯諾在花園里玩的時候，不小心摔倒把膝蓋碰傷了。在廚房幹活的穿著條紋睡衣的帕維爾趕過來幫助他包紮了傷口。兩人從此結為了好友。在房子周圍晃悠了幾周之後，布魯諾終於決定越過界限來到了一個用電線網製成的圍牆邊，看到圍牆的另一邊有一個穿著條紋睡衣的男孩在用手推車倒碎石子。

他很驚訝終於在這里發現了可以一起玩的同齡人，布魯諾以後每天都要偷偷來這里和新朋友什穆埃爾見面。數周過去，布魯諾對於自己的所見所聞愈加感到困惑，家人教導他所有猶太人都是魔鬼而他與什穆埃爾的關系卻越來越緊密。

另一方面，父親決定把他們和媽媽送到海德堡的姑姑那裡去。一想到從此無法再見到這位最好的新朋友，布魯諾感到很絕望。什穆埃爾告訴布魯諾自己的父親失蹤了三天，布魯諾決定利用最後的時間為他做些事情，於是也穿上了一件條紋睡衣，從一塊松動的鐵絲網下爬進集中營。

❹ 穿條紋睡衣的男孩觀後感

有人說現在是最好的時代，也有人說現在是最壞的時代，但從來沒有人說過二戰是一個好的時代。如果說二戰是先走進一片黑暗，《鋼琴家》《美麗人生》則帶你走過這片黑暗，迎接黎明充滿希望，而《穿條紋睡衣的男孩》則帶你迷失在黑暗裡，將美好的東西撕裂。

《穿條紋睡衣的男孩》以一個納粹家庭的天真孩童的視角來講述這段慘絕人寰的歷史，選取兩個孩童之間的純潔友誼，將殘酷最大化，讓人不敢再去看第二遍。

在電影的第29秒處出現了約翰貝傑曼說過的一句話：「在生命的黑暗滋生蔓延之前，用以丈量孩提時代的是我們的所聽所聞所見。」

與其他戰爭片不一樣，整部電影沒有令人心驚肉跳的情節、沒有炮火連天的戰場、沒有遍地屍體的畫面，展現給觀眾的是藍藍的天空、美麗的母親、幸福的家庭，以及孩童之間純潔的友誼，這部電影擁有講述孩童美好時代的所有要素。

而事實上，它又有著一部殘酷歷史影片所具備的細節：濃煙滾滾在上空、士兵的呵斥聲、狼狗的叫聲。

影片從孩童的視角來看待這場悲劇，一切事情彷彿都映在他那深藍色的瞳孔中。姐姐在被家庭教師洗腦性地灌輸法西斯思想後逐漸淪落的悲劇，母親無法接受這一切日日流淚，使故事的悲劇性氣氛逐漸呈現。

大鐵門內緊握的雙手、大鐵門外散落一地的睡衣、滂沱的大雨，似乎在與時間賽跑的士兵牽著狼狗狂奔而來，終是晚來一步，即使身為軍官的父親也難逃悲劇，讓自己的孩子迷失在黑森林淪為陪葬品。

而小布魯諾和施穆爾的悲劇，大概在故事的開頭就已註定，稚嫩的眼神中總是藏著焦慮，周圍所有的隱瞞幫他們屏蔽了醜陋，讓他們只看到彼此之間的真誠與美好，甚至在踏進深淵的最後一刻，仍以為自己在洗澡。

時代終會過去，但有人永遠留在了那個時代，永遠留在了那片黑暗裡，即使什麼都沒有做錯。

❺ 為什麼說《穿條紋睡衣的男孩》是高分佳片

這是一部發生在猶太人被屠殺的某個營地裡面，兩個同樣是穿條紋衫的男孩之間的故事,通過這部電影，你會看到生命兩種完全不同的形態，它沒有拍那些很煽情的片段，卻總能讓人潸然淚下,這是一部就算你不了解這段歷史也可以被感動到的電影。

1）我們先來看看本影片的主要內容介紹：高牆和鐵絲網擋住了自由之路，卻擋不住孩童干凈的雙眼。他們被當成了犯人，可是他們並沒有錯。九歲男孩布魯諾一家隨著納粹軍官父親的一紙調令,由柏林搬到了波蘭。酷愛探險的他很快對新家附近的「農場」產生了興趣，隔著高聳的圍牆和鐵絲網，人們身穿條紋睡衣終日忙碌。沒有人告訴他「農場」究竟是什麼，所有人都禁止他發問。在好奇心的驅使下，布魯諾悄悄溜出家門，結識了鐵絲網另一邊的同齡男孩什穆埃爾。某日，什穆埃爾的父親失蹤了，於是布魯諾決定穿上和什穆埃爾一模一樣的條紋睡衣，到鐵絲網的另一邊幫他尋找父親，作為兩個人分別前後的探險......

❻ 穿條紋睡衣的男孩 英文讀後感

The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas

Irish writer John Boyne's fourth novel is the first he has written for children. It's a touching tale of an odd friendship between two boys in horrendous circumstances and a reminder of man's capacity for inhumanity.

Bruno is a nine-year-old boy growing up in Berlin ring World War II. He lives in a five-storey house with servants, his mother and father and 12-year-old sister, Gretel. His father wears a fancy uniform and they have just been visited by a very important personage called the Fury, a pun which alt readers should have no trouble deciphering. As a consequence of this visit, Bruno's father gets a new uniform, his title changes to Commandment and, to Bruno's chagrin, they find themselves moving to a new home at a place called Out-With.

When Bruno gets there he is immediately homesick. He has left his school, his three best friends, his house, his grandparents and the bustling street life of urban Berlin with its cafes, fruit and veg stalls, and Saturday jostle. His new home is smaller, full of soldiers and there is no one to play with. From his bedroom window, however, he notices a town of people dressed in striped pyjamas separated from him by a wire fence. When he asks his father who those people are, he responds that they aren't really people.

Bruno is forbidden to explore but boredom, isolation and sheer curiosity become too much for him. One day, he follows the wire fence cordoning off the area where these people live from his house. He spots a dot in the distance on the other side of the fence and as he gets closer, he sees it's a boy. Excited by the prospect of a friend, Bruno introces himself. The Jewish boy's name is Shmuel. Almost every day, they meet at the same spot and talk. Eventually, for a variety of reasons, Bruno decides to climb under the fence and explore Shmuel's world.

After some initial tonal clunkiness where you can almost detect the author thinking "how do I write a child", the story is an effortless read that puts you directly into Bruno's worldview. It is elegant story-telling with emotional impact and an ending that in true fairytale style is grotesquely clever.

Bruno's friendship with Shmuel is rendered with neat awareness of the paradoxes between children's naive egocentricity, their innate concept of fairness, familial loyalty and obliviousness to the social conventions of discrimination. The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas is subtitled A Fable and, as in other modern fables such as Antoine de St Exupery's The Little Prince, Boyne uses Bruno to reveal the flaws in an alt world.

For me, as an alt reader, however, the fact that this fable is set in living history - the Holocaust - did, at times, jar. I couldn't help comparing it to the immediacy and complexity of Primo Levi's If This is a Man, or, to stick with children, The Diary of Anne Frank. From a perspective of German complicity in the Holocaust, books such as
Christa Wolf's superb A Model Childhood provide images of what it was like to have had a Nazi childhood, making this tale seem rather implausible.

Given his father's rank, it's highly likely Bruno would have been a brainwashed acolyte of the Hitler Youth. Perhaps fables are best when, like the The Little Prince with its asteroid settings, they are insulated by either time or imagination from actual history.

Still, these are alt quibbles about a children's book and probably unfair because of it, even if there is a sense this novel has ambitions to follow in the steps of The Little Prince (or Harry Potter, for that matter) and become one of those children's novels that alts read.

None of the scruples above should affect the reading pleasure of the book's primary audience. I wanted to test-drive The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas book with a nine-year-old but none could be bribed into reading it within the necessary timeframe for this review. Nevertheless, at the risk of using intuition instead of market research, I envisage children will identify with and be moved by this story, just as I was by books such as Ian Serraillier's The Silver Sword at a similar age.

Be prepared, however. In its allusiveness, The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas will provoke questions about the abhorrent conditions in which it is set and you may well find yourself needing to explain the Holocaust.

Irish writer John Boyne's fourth novel is the first he has written for children. It's a touching tale of an odd friendship between two boys in horrendous circumstances and a reminder of man's capacity for inhumanity.

Bruno is a nine-year-old boy growing up in Berlin ring World War II. He lives in a five-storey house with servants, his mother and father and 12-year-old sister, Gretel. His father wears a fancy uniform and they have just been visited by a very important personage called the Fury, a pun which alt readers should have no trouble deciphering. As a consequence of this visit, Bruno's father gets a new uniform, his title changes to Commandment and, to Bruno's chagrin, they find themselves moving to a new home at a place called Out-With.

When Bruno gets there he is immediately homesick. He has left his school, his three best friends, his house, his grandparents and the bustling street life of urban Berlin with its cafes, fruit and veg stalls, and Saturday jostle. His new home is smaller, full of soldiers and there is no one to play with. From his bedroom window, however, he notices a town of people dressed in striped pyjamas separated from him by a wire fence. When he asks his father who those people are, he responds that they aren't really people.

Bruno is forbidden to explore but boredom, isolation and sheer curiosity become too much for him. One day, he follows the wire fence cordoning off the area where these people live from his house. He spots a dot in the distance on the other side of the fence and as he gets closer, he sees it's a boy. Excited by the prospect of a friend, Bruno introces himself. The Jewish boy's name is Shmuel. Almost every day, they meet at the same spot and talk. Eventually, for a variety of reasons, Bruno decides to climb under the fence and explore Shmuel's world.

After some initial tonal clunkiness where you can almost detect the author thinking "how do I write a child", the story is an effortless read that puts you directly into Bruno's worldview. It is elegant story-telling with emotional impact and an ending that in true fairytale style is grotesquely clever.

Bruno's friendship with Shmuel is rendered with neat awareness of the paradoxes between children's naive egocentricity, their innate concept of fairness, familial loyalty and obliviousness to the social conventions of discrimination. The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas is subtitled A Fable and, as in other modern fables such as Antoine de St Exupery's The Little Prince, Boyne uses Bruno to reveal the flaws in an alt world.

For me, as an alt reader, however, the fact that this fable is set in living history - the Holocaust - did, at times, jar. I couldn't help comparing it to the immediacy and complexity of Primo Levi's If This is a Man, or, to stick with children, The Diary of Anne Frank. From a perspective of German complicity in the Holocaust, books such as
Christa Wolf's superb A Model Childhood provide images of what it was like to have had a Nazi childhood, making this tale seem rather implausible.

Given his father's rank, it's highly likely Bruno would have been a brainwashed acolyte of the Hitler Youth. Perhaps fables are best when, like the The Little Prince with its asteroid settings, they are insulated by either time or imagination from actual history.

Still, these are alt quibbles about a children's book and probably unfair because of it, even if there is a sense this novel has ambitions to follow in the steps of The Little Prince (or Harry Potter, for that matter) and become one of those children's novels that alts read.

None of the scruples above should affect the reading pleasure of the book's primary audience. I wanted to test-drive The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas book with a nine-year-old but none could be bribed into reading it within the necessary timeframe for this review. Nevertheless, at the risk of using intuition instead of market research, I envisage children will identify with and be moved by this story, just as I was by books such as Ian Serraillier's The Silver Sword at a similar age.

Be prepared, however. In its allusiveness, The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas will provoke questions about the abhorrent conditions in which it is set and you may well find yourself needing to explain the Holocaust.

❼ 穿條紋睡衣的男孩影評

《穿條紋睡衣的男孩》影評如下：

《穿條紋睡衣的男孩》在以兒童的視角反映歷史慘劇的同時更透露出人性的光輝，那是父母對孩子的愛，是姐弟間親情的愛，是小朋友間純真的友誼，是彼此間的關懷與溫暖。雪崩時沒有一片雪花是無辜的，電影的結局恰恰證明了這一點，毒氣房外的長鏡頭以及慢慢變成黑白的場景已然昭示了結局。

電影整體給人的情感由輕松變為沉重，絕望像烏雲籠罩著，卻等不到一陣吹散它的風，以及一束陽光的普照。

劇情簡介

《穿條紋睡衣的男孩》根據愛爾蘭新銳作家約翰·伯恩2006年出版的同名小說改編。由馬克·赫曼執導，阿沙·巴特菲爾德、維拉·法梅加和魯伯特·弗蘭德等聯袂主演。影片於2008年11月7日在美國上映。

影片講述二戰期間，八歲的布魯諾是集中營德國司令官的兒子，他與集中營圍欄的另一邊的一個猶太男孩（Jack Scanlon飾）結下了友誼，從而發生了許多令人意料不到的事情。

❽ 《穿條紋睡衣的男孩》深度解析是什麼

戰爭對人性的荼毒，比它害人性命更可恨。苦難中，人的美醜善惡會比稀鬆平常的日子裡更加鮮明。

影片評價：

穿條紋睡衣的男孩透過一個孩子的眼睛來講述二戰中德國集中營中的情景，以一個孩子的視角來審視那個特殊的年代。那些殺戮和令人難以直視的鮮血，在孩子的眼中被折射的是如此光陸怪離和有趣，但越是現實的殘酷就越是讓人心血尤滴。

這部電影與暮光之城一樣，都是根據小說改編而成，當然題材和受眾群已經是天壤之別。雖然本片有著兒童電影的色彩，但本質上還是一部嚴肅的劇情電影。

尤其是直指奧斯維辛集中營這一二戰中納粹屠殺猶太人和各國戰俘最為血腥骯臟的地方，而且本片主題試圖探尋關於人性的難題，然而卻將影片本身放在了搖擺不定的道德天平上，更是使得本片的觀眾群上調了若干檔次。

盡管有些不切實際的幻想，這部電影依舊是一部感人肺腑的佳作。穿條紋睡衣的男孩極其沉重的結尾將影片上升到了新的水平。