Ⅰ 急求電影《後天》英文觀後感
I watched the movie "Day After Tomorrow" has strong feelings. I think this is the advent of catastrophe is not only natural disasters, more importantly, the destruction of human beings to the earth. Warming of the Earth continuously, because of human emissions from non-stop, cut down trees. This is wrong. We must properly protect the earth, a variety of trees, love nature, love animals, do not let the earth be polluted! 行不？
Ⅱ 後天觀後感英文版
篇一：《後天》 觀後感 英文版
英文：
The feedback of“the day after tomorrow”
This is my second time to see “the day after tomorrow”. The first time, and many others, I see the contradiction between human and nature, environmental pollution, energy deficiency. How stupid human are, and human is so small in the disaster. Then, I think more about how to protect the environment and save energy to avoid this situation happens.
But this time, I didn’t see the film from environment, but from the human. I saw people’s affection, friendship and love in the face of death, serious work and dedication, and some people is fatuous and ignorant in the face of scientific.
The time, I really feel what is responsibility, what is persist, what is commitment. In many cases, we do not need to go to the principle of the so-called persistent on the way of things. Some critical moment, we have to give up some minor things, only know how to choose can do anything more perfect.
這是我第二次看《後天》這部電影。第一次，和很多人一樣，我看到的是人類和自然的矛盾，環境問題，資源問題，覺得人類是多麼的愚蠢，在災難面前是多麼的渺小。然後就想著怎樣保護環境，節約能源，避免電影上的情況真的發生。
但是這次，我並沒有從環境的角度去看這部電影，而是從人性的角度去看。我看到了，在災難面前人們親情、友情、愛情的體現，看到了人們在死亡面前的勇敢，對工作的認真和執著，還有一些人在科學面前的愚昧與無知。
這次，我深深地感受到了什麼是責任，什麼是堅持，什麼是承諾。很多時候，我們沒有必要為了那些所謂的原則去執著於某一種做事方式。在某些關鍵時刻，我們必須得放棄一些次要的東西，必須懂得取捨才可以把一件事做得更完美。
篇二：後天 觀後感 英文版
People always thought that probably as a human on the planet Earth is the most senior animal owners who dominate nature. Can be wanton destruction of the earth, nature mutilations. Also for the immediate interests of the greedy nature and the blood drained 、 the nature of the skin stripped 、 nature of the meat-eating. With the thought this will be what kind of consequences. Also claimed ignorance 、 elated to conquer nature. Sing really ridiculous. If another Ice Age in front of us, the humanity will be caught unprepared? Human nature can conquer? No, summer 2004 opening large - <<acquired>> given us a loud and affirmative answer to the question. This terrible disaster films told us an irrefutable truth - always dominate the natural person. "Acquired" the film depicts the United States as a representative of the Earth within one day suddenly nose-dive into glacial science fiction stories. In the story, climate scientists Jack. Hall observed in the study pointed out that prehistoric climate, the greenhouse effect brought about by global warming could trigger an unprecedented global catastrophe. Mainly refer to the destruction of the beautiful human nature, but by the serious nature of the punishment. Lightning 、 、 hail storm 、 tornado 、 hurricane 、 、 floods caused by global warming, such as the melting of Antarctic ice disaster befall humans, before human consciousness to know repentance may have been too late. In an instant because of the disaster emerged, floods, in the eyes; hail, in the eyes; all in the eyes of force majeure. Entry into the Earth's greenhouse effect will glaciation. Tornado 、 earthquake tsunami 、…… So you ask that the name will become a natural part of human life. In the film, you can see New York City inundated lens: the confusion of the crowd the air vehicle broken glass, followed by the floor, as high waves… you can see in the seaside holiday resort in Hawaii hit by the hurricane scene. This is the destruction of the natural consequences, and this is the punishment of mankind. For thousands of years, continually engulfed in the natural human body, should now enjoy nature of the pernicious consequences of brewing.
Ⅲ 急求電影《後天》英文觀後感，翻譯即可
I watched the movie "Day After Tomorrow" has strong feelings. I think this is the advent of catastrophe is not only natural disasters, more importantly, the destruction of human beings to the earth. Warming of the Earth continuously, because of human emissions from non-stop, cut down trees. This is wrong. We must properly protect the earth, a variety of trees, love nature, love animals, do not let the earth be polluted!
行不？
Ⅳ 求一篇200字電影《後天》的觀後感
今天，媽媽帶我去看了一部很好看的電影，名字叫做「後天(Thedayaftertomorrow)」，「後天」是部災難片。
第一個出現災難的是日本的東京。有一天，有一個叔叔他下班去喝酒，他喝了一會兒就下冰雹了。他家人給他打電話，話還沒說完，他就被冰雹打死了。世界各地還有很多類似的災難，我還要給大家說的是：美國紐約出現了水災，是最嚴重的國家。有些人被餓死了，有些人被冷死了。因此，我們就應該保護小草，小樹，不能傷害他們。
Ⅳ 寫一篇關於 《後天》這部電影的200個單詞的作文
"Over the past few weeks. Let us feel, in front of the forces of nature we are
so small. Over the years, we always thought, we can reckless squandering of our
planet's natural resources, we are wrong, I was wrong... "Film" the day after
tomorrow ", shocking disaster scenes, like be struck with fright plot, full of
people in the field of tenacity and dedication, and the ultimate value of life
and profound thinking about the meaning, and the demands on the harmonious
coexistence of man and nature.
When the last saw Sam one family security survival, psychological surviving a
warm haven't covered in snow and ice.But despite the warm, still nearly
a country nearly half of the people regret, "go with" Jack "for a lifetime"
Frank mourned for the victims, the president and sad. No ground for blame, human
life is the most precious, so, do you have thought about the "acquired" may
really falling?
We respect life, we should respect our planet, and only your love, the future
survival of people "rights" can be guaranteed, constantly destruction will
eventually let us destroy
中文譯文："過去的幾個星期里讓我們感到，在大自然的力量面前我們是多麼的渺小。多年來，我們一直以為，我們可以不計後果地揮霍我們星球的自然資源，我們錯了，我錯了......"電影《後天》，震憾的災難場景，一樣驚心動魄的情節，一樣充滿了人在絕景中的頑強和奉獻精神，還有對生命終極價值和意義的深刻思考，以及關於人與自然和諧共存的訴求。
當最後看到薩姆一家人安全存活的時候，心理倖存的一份溫暖還沒有被冰雪覆蓋。可是盡管溫暖存在，還是不免為將近一個國家的將近一半的人民惋惜，為「跟隨」傑克「一輩子」的弗蘭克的離去而痛心，為不幸遇難的總統而痛心。無可厚非，人的生命是最寶貴的，那麼，大家是否有想過或許那個「後天」有可能真的會降臨呢？
我們尊重生命，就應當尊重我們生存的星球，而只有大家共同愛護，未來人們的生存「權利」才能得到保障，不斷地破壞終究
希望我的答案對你有幫助~望採納~O(∩_∩)O~
Ⅵ 《後天》 觀後感 英語
People always thought that probably as a human on the planet Earth is the most senior animal owners who dominate nature. Can be wanton destruction of the earth, nature mutilations. Also for the immediate interests of the greedy nature and the blood drained 、 the nature of the skin stripped 、 nature of the meat-eating. With the thought this will be what kind of consequences. Also claimed ignorance 、 elated to conquer nature. Sing really ridiculous. If another Ice Age in front of us, the humanity will be caught unprepared? Human nature can conquer? No, summer 2004 opening large - <<acquired>> given us a loud and affirmative answer to the question. This terrible disaster films told us an irrefutable truth - always dominate the natural person.
"Acquired" the film depicts the United States as a representative of the Earth within one day suddenly nose-dive into glacial science fiction stories. In the story, climate scientists Jack. Hall observed in the study pointed out that prehistoric climate, the greenhouse effect brought about by global warming could trigger an unprecedented global catastrophe. Mainly refer to the destruction of the beautiful human nature, but by the serious nature of the punishment. Lightning 、 、 hail storm 、 tornado 、 hurricane 、 、 floods caused by global warming, such as the melting of Antarctic ice disaster befall humans, before human consciousness to know repentance may have been too late. In an instant because of the disaster emerged, floods, in the eyes; hail, in the eyes; all in the eyes of force majeure. Entry into the Earth's greenhouse effect will glaciation. Tornado 、 earthquake tsunami 、…… So you ask that the name will become a natural part of human life. In the film, you can see New York City inundated lens: the confusion of the crowd the air vehicle broken glass, followed by the floor, as high waves… you can see in the seaside holiday resort in Hawaii hit by the hurricane scene. This is the destruction of the natural consequences, and this is the punishment of mankind. For thousands of years, continually engulfed in the natural human body, should now enjoy nature of the pernicious consequences of brewing.
Ⅶ 一篇英文電影評論 <<後天>>
1. This movie takes a big-budget, special-effects-filled look at what the world would look like if the greenhouse effect and global warming continued at such levels that they resulted in worldwide catastrophe and disaster, including multiple hurricanes, tornadoes, tidal waves, floods and the beginning of the next Ice Age. At the center of the story is a paleoclimatologist (a scientist who studies the ways weather patterns changed in the past), Professor Jack Hall (Quaid), who tries to save the world from the effects of global warming while also trying to get to his son, Sam (Gyllenhaal), who was in New York City as part of a scholastic competition, when the city was overwhelmed by the chilling beginnings of the new Ice Age. In addition to all of the other challenges Dr. Hall faces, he's also going against the flow as humanity races south to warmer climes, and he's nearly the only one going north...
2. When global warming causes world wide disasters and leads to an ice age, a climatologist named Jack Hall tries to rescue his son Sam who is trapped in New York. Jack must go from Washington D.C. to New York, but on the way some things happen. Can Jack rescue his son?
3. We humans are such sinners. We pillage and plunder our planet's natural resources, carelessly and indignantly burn our fossil fuels, and throw caution to the wind for our wanton irresponsiblity.
Well, to coin a classic phrase, "It's not nice to fool Mother Nature." And she's one broad you don't dare want to mess with, as the disaster-laden THE DAY AFTER TOMORROW attests. In a movie that must have environmentalists and tree huggers worldwide grinning from pierced ear to pierced ear, we humans are forced at last to atone for the sin of global warming--a sin that melts the polar caps and brings on another Ice Age (in about the time it takes to play a baseball game).
Forget the plot. It's worse than bad--it's trite, banal, hackneyed, threadbare, and worn-out all rolled into one. Dennis Quaid is the climatologist who predicts doom but is subsequently ignored by his greedy government; he also has a son who ends up trapped in New York. The beautiful Sela Ward plays the standard this-disaster-epic-must-have-a-female-lead-who-spends-her-time-wringing-her-hands-and-looking-worried-and-then-cries part. Ian Holm, for goodness sake, is Bilbo Baggins, not some Scottish scientist about to go into the deep freeze, and Jake Gyllenhaal, who plays Quaid's and Ward's son, has a constant smirk on his face that I could never figure out.
As I said, forget the plot. This movie's strength is its visual onslaught of destruction and disaster on a global scale--from tornadoes ravaging Los Angeles (Why do LA TV reporters feel compelled to cover a twister a stone's throw away on live TV?) to three cataclysmic "blizzard hurricanes" that devour the Northern Hemisphere. The special effects are well-done, and jarring; seeing a huge tidal wave overtake the Statue of Liberty and then sweep relentlessly into Manhattan (Why didn't Brooklyn and Queens get equal time?) is bone-chilling. Throw in a pack of hungry wolves escaped from the zoo and an eye of each storm that plunges the temperature minus 150 degrees in a matter of seconds, and you've got a virtual kitchen sink of gloom and doom. Our fearless government reluctantly acts; in a huge twist of irony, the U.S. is evacuated, with its citizens streaming into Mexico, and the northern states take on a popsicle effect. It's all great fun to watch.
THE DAY AFTER TOMORROW succeeds on the visual, and fails dismally on everything else. Now I've got to go get my twelve-pack out of the freezer. I want to see what frozen beer tastes like.
4. There's no two ways about it...filmmaker Roland Emmerich really despises New York...three of his last four films depict some level of destruction within the Big Apple. Why does he hate it so? I have no idea, but he also doesn't seem all that found of Los Angeles, either...
The Day After Tomorrow (2004), written, proced and directed by Roland Emmerich stars Dennis Quaid (who'd been having a really decent run of good films, up until now, that is...), and Jake Gyllenhaal, who seems to bounce between really good movies (Donnie Darko) to really lousy ones (Bubble Boy, Highway). Also appearing is Emmy Rossum (who bares a remarkable resemblance, at times, to American Pie's Elizabeth Shannon), Jay O. Sanders (Daylight), Perry King (The Lords of Flatbush), Kenneth Walsh (Miracle), Sela `yowsa, yowsa' Ward, and Ian `Bilbo Baggins' Holm.
Okay...Jack Hall (Quaid) is a paleoclimatologist...what's that, you say? Well, apparently it's someone who studies the weather of the past, using ice core samples from the artic and sophisticated computer programs...more or less a glorified weatherman. During his research, he's found evidence to support the world is soon (soon meaning anywhere from 100 to 1,000 years) heading for another ice age, but no one is taking him too seriously, especially not the haughty Vice President (Walsh), probably e to the fact the weather reports we get on the TV are usually only right about half the time, so why should we jump through hoops for this clown? Surprise, surprise, it turns out Walsh is right (but his timing is way off...typical weatherman) as the poopie hits the fan...big time. Hail the size of footballs in Japan, tornadoes in LA, tide waves and crazy snow in New York (haven't they suffered enough?), all resulting in a global climate change, which doesn't sound all that bad, but basically the entire northern hemisphere is buried under ice and snow...a lot of ice and snow...and temperatures are dropping. Oh why didn't they listen to Hall? The fools...the frozen fools...
I will say this...The Day After Tomorrow sported some of the best special effects I've seen in awhile. The wide scale destruction of major cities was very intense (Irwin Allen, the master of disaster, the man who brought us all those wonderful 70's disaster movie, would have been proud)...also, I thought the acting was passable, which is sad, given the experienced cast involved, but they were just doing what they were told. If I were to rate this film on the special effects alone, it would be five stars, but I have to also consider the other aspects, the story, the dialog and such. It's these elements (or lack of) that ultimately derailed the film, for me at least. Emmerich seems to try and dazzle the audience with glossy special effects in hope we won't put too much thought into all the holes, large and small, that riddle the plot. I remember when I saw Emmerich's Independence Day (1996) for the first time, I was really taken with the film, but subsequent viewings revealed the paper thin construction, allowing the story to collapse in on itself...here, I need not watch the film again as the flimsy nature came through like a sledgehammer to the head...and Emmerich lays on the schmaltzy, maudlin sentimentality, disguised in the form of altruistic self sacrifice and heroism, about as thick as he lays the snows on New York...I would have thought it difficult to top the gushy, slushy, saccharine sweet goo presented in Independence Day, but I was wrong, as here, he turns it into an art form. The dialog was just awful...I was surprised some of the actors managed to get their lines out while keeping a straight face. Also, the dialog was entirely predictable, especially between the pregnant pauses meant to heighten the emotional level for the drivel soon to follow...I actually found myself speaking lines before they were spoken in the film, as it was that obvious as to what was coming. And the film seems inundated with a preachy smugness...yes, we consume fossil fuels and use resources from the Earth, but does that necessarily make us evil and deserving of the scenario played out in this film? I love it when Hollywood, in all of its shallow gloriousness, tries to teach the rest of the world what's wrong with us. This is a big difference between Emmerich and Irwin Allen...Allen made disaster films to engage and entertain, while Emmerich seems to use the medium as a means to tell us the error of our so called destructive ways, and showing the ruinous consequences that result. Ahh, I've stood on my soapbox long enough...here's some scenes to watch for...the one, after New York is frozen, with the homeless man teaching the rich kid, who normally wouldn't have given the filthy man the time of day, how to use newspapers and such to insulate himself by stuffing them in his clothes...can you see the irony here? The homeless, once a burden on our society, have now, after the disaster, found purpose in advising the uninitiated on how to survive, as they've had to do living on the mean streets. Everyone go out and befriend a homeless person now, before it's too late...okay, how about this scene...the kids, now stuck in the Manhattan library after the storm, are scrounging for food, and break into some vending machines. The homeless guy suggests looking in the trash cans, as there's always something to eat in trash cans (yeah, okay...I'll tell you what my stinky friend, I'll eat the potato chips and M&M's and you can have whatever edible, maggot infested morsels you find rummaging in the garbage)...again, infinitely invaluable advice from the homeless...
Ⅷ 3篇初二英語電影觀後感，60字，英文
英語電影觀後感今天，我們看了一部電影，這部電影的名字叫做：後天。這部電影講的是：世界上發生了一場全球變寒的事件，電影中播放的是在紐約等地區溫度急劇下降，幾乎是每秒下降十幾度。天上還在下可怕的冰雹，還有更恐怕的龍卷風，紐約城在被龍卷風穿過後，一瞬間，變成了破城，更使整個城市變成了白白的一片。這真的讓人觸目驚心，使人的心久久不能平靜下來，雖然電影中十分誇張，可是我們現在還不是這樣：全球變暖。所以請同學們從自己做起，保護環境，讓我們的環境更美麗！
下面是英語翻譯：Today, we watched a movie, the name of this movie was called:The day after tomorrow.What this movie speaks BE:A world happened to become cold affairs in the world,What to broadcast it is an etc. the region temperature nasty play in New York to descend in the movie, is almost each to descend more than ten degree.The sky still descends terrible hail, also having more afraid of of .Tornado, city in New York became to break city for an instant after being cut through by tornado, making the whole city become more without results one.This really lets the person touch eyes shocking, make the person's heart can't fall calm once in a very long while, although exaggerate very in the movie, but we now not just so:world become warm...So ask the classmates to rise from the do-it-yourself, environmental protection, make our environments more beautiful!