Ⅰ 英文電影觀後感200詞
英文電影觀後感200詞【1】
This is a story in modern London of a modern sherlork. This TV drama is based on the famouse detective novel of the british novelist Arthur Conan Doyle.It took the background from the 19C to the 21 centry .And the fashion and talent detective sherlock holmes with his fantastic assistant John watson are facing a series of danderous and unusual events in London.
There is quite a lot of differences between this fashion sherlock and the classical one.He is fashion,he use blackberry,sent masagers.He takes taxi instead of gharry.He writes blog,he even became a hit on twitter.But the same thing is that he is thing and tall,sagacious and shouws quick first response all the time.He is also good at biology and his incredible outsight shocks the audience all the time.The change of the new sherlock dosen't make us fell uncomfortable,but the quick plot and the mixture of many stories of the novel in every episode makes an impression to holmes fans.All of the changes show that this Holmes belongs to our times.
英文電影觀後感200詞【2】
Peter Parker is a high school student. By accident, he is bitted by a genetically-altered spider and after that, he found that he gains the strange power of spider. Therefore, he uses his power to fight crime. However, Norman Osborn with the new source of energy has become an enemy of Spider-man, Green Goblin. Spider-man needs to fight with Green Goblin, but he confuses as Norman Osborn is the father of his best friend. On the other hand, Peter Parker struggles to fall in love with Mary Jane.
My opinions:
I like this film because its fight scenes are great and the animation in Spider-man is impressive, especially the part of Spider-man flying in the sky, it looks realistic. The music in Spider-man made me feel excited. However, the part about the love between Peter Parker and Mary Jane is quite boring. Besides, I like the story of the film, it is outstanding and teaches me 「With great power comes great responsibility.」 We have our own responsibilities in our life and now, my responsibility is to work hard.
英文電影觀後感200詞【3】
My personal favorite "101D" medium is Disney's "101 Dalmatians: the Series". It combines many themes of the existing material (Dodie Smith book, 1961 and 1996 movies). But still does its own things, too.
Our main pups include brave Lucky, who gets a strong personality mirroring his character in the book, lovable Rolly, the gourmand of the pups, and sweet little Cadpig, who is the true runt of the litter. Also there is Spot the chicken, who longs to be a dog. I find them all extremely amiable and enjoyable to watch. They are usually foiling Cruella's schemes for their land, or outwitting Lt. Pug (I'll get to him later), or sneaking into Grutely, or...just having fun, making a very likable show.
Ⅱ 求勇敢的心觀後感一篇，英文的，300字左右
1
Wags enjoy razzing the 13th-century Scottish epic Braveheart, starring Mel Gibson in the role of freedom fighter William Wallace, as Die Hard in a kilt. Wait till they get to the knobby question of how Gibson's knees stack up against Liam Neeson's in Rob Roy. No matter. Gibson gets the last laugh. Braveheart resists glib categorization. This rousing, romantic adventure is laced with sorrow and savagery. The audacity Gibson shows as the film's director extends to the running time, which is nearly three hours. Hamlet, with Gibson playing the melancholy Dane, was shorter, and Braveheart isn't Shakespeare. Don't panic. Though the film dawdles a bit with the shimmery, dappled love stuff involving Wallace with a Scottish peasant and a French princess, the action will pin you to your seat. With breathtaking skill, Gibson captures the exhilaration and horror of combat in some of the most vivid battle scenes ever filmed.
Wallace was knighted for leading his people in the fight against domination by England. Few facts are known about his personal life, which frees Gibson and screenwriter Randall Wallace (no relation) to run with the legend passed down mostly from the rhyming verse of a poet known as Blind Harry. It's a shame that Harry predates Hollywood by five centuries -- he could have made a killing cranking out kick-ass crowd pleasers.
Gibson's Wallace is a potent blend of Robin Hood, Attila the Hun and, yes, the wags were right, Detective John McClane in Die Hard. Wallace could relate to any story that pits one pissed-off fighter against the system. He faced an English army led by bad-to-the-bone King Edward the Longshanks, played by Patrick McGooban in a classic portrait of slithering sadism. Wallace also had to inspire Scottish peasants and nobles to follow his lead against daunting odds.
It's a ripping yarn, and Gibson could have slid by with the usual hack heroics. Kevin Costner's Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves did just that and still earned a pile. Gibson does it the hard way with attention to detail. He has retained the keen eye for character he showed in The Man Without a Face, his promising 1993 directing debut. Wallace doesn't spring to life as a full-blown legend, though he does speak Latin and French when he returns to his village in Scotland to settle down as a farmer and marry Murron (the meltingly lovely Catherine McCormack), his childhood sweetheart. It's the brutal fate dished out to Murron by the English that makes the farmer an outlaw.
That's when Wallace organizes the villagers into a ragtag militia. Brendon Gleeson's Hamish, James Cosmo's Campbell and Alun Armstrong's Mornay register strongly, as does David O'Hara's Stephen, the Irish warrior who joins the Scottish cause. The teasing camaraderie botched in Robin Hood is expertly handled here. Gibson's impassioned performance as the hero who would not trade his freedom for English gold doesn't shrink from showing the barbarian who emerges at a call to arms.
"Are you ready for war?" Wallace shouts to his outnumbered troops at Stirling. It's the film's first major battle scene and a triumph for Gibson. Trying to stir hundreds of fatigued soldiers to action, Wallace rides his horse back and forth in a frantic effort to be heard. In most historical films, the stationary star manages to move multitudes with a throaty whisper. Gibson jettisons the Hollywood fakery. Riding among the men, his face streaked with woad (a blue dye used to terrify the enemy) and his voice hoarse from yelling. Wallace is a demon warrior crying out for vengeance.
Cinematographer John Toll, an Oscar winner for Legends of the Fall, thrusts the audience into the brutal frays at Stirling, York and Falkirk. Superbly edited by Steven Rosenblum (Glory), these sequences recall the blood poetry of Welles' Chimes at Midnight and Kurosawa's Seven Samurai. Sophisticated weaponry was centuries away. The Scots used hammers, axes, picks, swords, chains and even farm tools to crack skulls as they battered the English in the mud. They also set oil traps on the ground to burn their enemies, though shields and chain mail offered scant protection against the rain of English arrows. "Quite the lovely gathering." says Longshanks, surveying the carnage and dispatching his officers to send in Irish volunteers instead of expert English archers. "Arrows cost money," he sneers.
Gibson's handling of Wallace at war is so thrillingly done that one regrets the subplots that distract from the action. Wallace's flirtation with the king's French daughter-in-law, Princess Isabelle (Sophie Marceau), is fanciful fluff that undercuts his undying love for Murron, and the king's homophobic revenge on his preening son, Prince Edward (Peter Hanly), and the son's boy toy, Phillip (Stephen Billington), comes off as inexplicable gay ting. Judicious cutting might have sharpened the film's focus and impact.
Still, don't get your kilt in a bunch over a spectacle that provokes such lively debate about the method and madness of war. Filmed with furious energy and surprising gravity, Braveheart takes the measure of a hero with a taste for blood to match his taste for honor. Wallace is an inspiring, unsettling role, and Gibson plays him, aptly, like a gathering storm.
2
Braveheart is an action/drama movie about William Wallace (Mel Gibson). The film is no less than amazing in any way. Though the movie sports us with a 177 minute run time, it is amazing to see the interesting way in which, Mel Gibson behind the camera, works his magic. As the acting is magnificent, and the war sequences are brutal and violent, the film works out as a movie which will always be remembered as a classic.
The film focuses on William Wallace, growing up as a kid, his father was a fighter. After his death, his uncle took him in to watch over him, and teach him how to fight. When he is older though, he meets Murron MacClannough(Catherine McCormack). After he weds with her, she is murdered. Now avenging her death, William sets out ot fight for his freedom, his justice and the right to live.
Mel Gibson did really an amazing job on capturing the character of William Wallace. Putting on the Irish accent, he shows us that he is a great actor and can do some things which we never thought he could do. Behind the camrea though, Mel is a completely different kind of person. He captures the fight scenes perfectly and beautifully. The one thing that was done well though, was the greatly realistic violence and brutal warfare of the film. The violence is spilled nicely, and realistically.
3
Braveheart is another film directed by its star, Mel Gibson. Close on the heels of Rob Roy, this is the second tribute to a legendary Scottish hero, this time round William Wallace, the great medieval warrior leader. Though less clever than its predecessor, it is much grander in its nearly three-hour epic sweep.
The obvious comparison is with Henry V (the Olivier, not the Branagh), and even though Randall Wallace may not be quite so good a screenwriter as Shakespeare, the movie can hold its own. Randall Wallace calls himself the spiritual descendant of William Wallace, and he has deftly incorporated the not many known facts about his namesake, and addressed the legend with gusto and eloquence. The result is an epic that, a few excessively romantic touches notwithstanding, is more realistic than most. These medieval Scots live in ferocious-looking hovels, seem (at least the men) heroically unwashed, and have coiffures in which a kestrel could nest. The friendly punches with which they communicate could easily kill a lesser fellow -- an Englishman, say. Braveheart aims to be a thinking man's epic. ``It's our wits that make us men,'' young William's da tells him, and, after da and big brother are killed by the English, Uncle Argyll continues the boy's ecation along similar lines. Pretty soon William has turned into Mel Gibson, a young man who wants to settle down and live in peace. But the English are making things hard, what with such things as ius primae noctis (in the film, more tersely but less correctly, the prima nocte) giving the English magistrate the right to deflower each lassie on her wedding night. Braveheartrending business, that. Finally William secretly marries the bonniest of lasses, Murron -- played by the breathtakingly beautiful and talented Catherine McCormack -- but the English get wind of it, and when she won't put out for them, slit her throat in a shattering scene irradiated by Miss McCormack's performance. So William turns avenger and, by one small further step, leader of the Scottish populace (as opposed to the nobles, suborned by Edward Longshanks, the Machiavellian English king). There are plots and counterplots as the nobles sabotage William's efforts, and Robert the Bruce, who wants to help him, is prevented by his leprous father (well played by Ian Bannen), who expects the nobles to crown his son king. And much, much more. The love scenes are so-so, the political scenes ho-hum, but the fighting -- both indivial contests and mass battle scenes -- is first-rate, barbaric, and sublime. You might think that so much battle stuff would pall after a while: how much slashing, chopping, stabbing, and skewering -- not to mention mangling and incinerating -- can there be without diminishing returns? Quite a bit; Gibson, to give him his e, comes up with new forms of warfare, better ways to turn charging men and horses into shishkebabs, new modes of battering down castle gates in a rain of boiling pitch from the battlements, fresh tricks to outsmart the enemy. And whereas this much violence with modern weapons would be unbearable, with medieval arms it becomes heroic and exhilarating. There is something appealing about Mel Gibson -- the ruggedly masculine countenance, the quick half-smile, the knack of conveying blue-eyed hurt (as when he discovers the Bruce under an enemy helmet), and a squarer-jawed determination than Dick Tracy's -- that sustains Braveheart even through the unlikely scenes with Isabelle, the Princess of Wales (indifferently played by Sophie Marceau), and through the Wallace's -- or the Gibson's -- unconvincing displays of polyglotism. Add to this the beauties of Scotland, searchingly chronicled by John Toll's inexhaustible camera, the solid supporting performances among which Patrick McGoohan's sardonic-sadistic Edward I is especially noteworthy (never before have terminal consonants been drawn out to such ironic length), and the intelligently deployed music by James Horner. A Scottish acquaintance, George Campbell, questions the use of the sweeter uilleann (Irish) bagpipes rather than the fiercer Highland ones ring the battle scenes, but these scenes are so exciting Horner could have used marimbas and I wouldn't have noticed. The film put me in mind of a four-line poem by Scotland's greatest modern poet, Hugh MacDiarmid: The rose of all the world is not for me. I want for my part Only the little white rose of Scotland that smells sharp and sweet -- And breaks the heart. And that is high praise.
4
What is there that can be said about Braveheart that hasn』t been said before? It』s an epic movie that ought to be in the conversation about the best films of the past thirty years. And actually, 「epic」 might be too small of a word. Braveheart is as much about the inner drama of William Wallace as it is about the life-and-death drama of the war for Scotland』s independence in the late 13th, early 14th centuries. It』s a story told on a grand scale with a great deal craft – and flair (and humor). This is a movie that offers both style and substance. It』s a direct precursor to the success of the Lord of the Rings movies – indeed, one can argue that the success of Braveheart set the stage for those films. True, Braveheart may not have universal appeal in terms of genre, story, or its brutal portrayal of war. But there can be little doubt of the value of a film that is, simply, one of the best I have ever seen.
The success of the film rests on the balance with which the story unfolds. Put simply, there』s something here for everyone: romance, action, character, philosophy, conflict, cinematography, great lines, music, and so on … and it all fits together almost flawlessly. I』m sure if you looked hard enough you could find fault with some parts of the movie, but considering its nearly three-hour run time it manages to avoid pitfalls remarkably well.
This is William Wallace』s story. And through him, the audience is allowed a mirror with which to view itself. This is the true measure of a great story: its ability to not only provide commentary, but also to provoke introspection. And that happens here quite often. One of the film』s most quoted lines is 「Every man dies, not every man really lives.」 Within just those seven words there is a great deal of thought and sentiment. It encapsulates a philosophy, a raison d』être, that anyone can immediately identify with. And it』s a beautiful philosophy – like carpe diem. And it encourages us to find the purpose and meaning within our lives on a daily basis.
This is also a love story, between William Wallace and Murron – a childhood friend. Theirs is a story that flows effortlessly from childhood tragedy and bonding, to althood romance and marriage. Indeed, it is Murron』s murder that proves to be Wallace』s motivation to launch his personal war against England whose king, Edward 『the Longshanks』 is portrayed with a powerfully brutality in the film, making him a very compelling villain.
Wallace』s quest is joined by a cast that is quite adept in their roles. There are hardly any weak links in the acting of this movie, which means that the underlying themes and conflicts are portrayed to maximum effect from start to finish. Mel Gibson』s directing certainly has to be credited for some of that success.
This is, without question, Gibson』s film. And it』s not without a certain part of vanity from the lead actor and director. If you were looking for a critique, this would be the most fertile ground for it. But for the most part, whatever vanity Gibson may have been displaying is overshadowed by the craft of everything else. The action is riveting, the dialogue is crisp (and profound) and the music is deeply, deeply moving.
James Horner』s score successfully taps into the heritage of Scotland while displaying a full orchestral presentation. The instrumentation and arrangements are all very well done, from wavering flute to the bagpipes to the thunderous percussion ring battle sequences.
5
I used to think that the history of Scotland around the end of the thirteenth century was one of those really complicated and messy affairs that could send any historian into a fit of sobbing. So imagine my surprise as I discovered it's really all about a bunch of rowdy guys mooning each other across a battlefield and then playing dodgeball.
"Braveheart" is one of those audacious films that implies that war is "bad" by putting the violence at the forefront, slowing it down and tossing in lots of extra blood, piercings, stabbings, castrations, amputations and assorted mutilations with random insertions of Mel's butt -- just to make sure that the women get into it too. This is all topped off by a really long and protracted moment where the camera lovingly dotes on Mel Gibson as he is taken to a platform to be tortured. It's the kind of moment that makes preschoolers point to the screen and say, "Christ figure! Christ figure!" Either that or: "Look! He's shamelessly grooming himself for the Oscars!" (Oscar committees love Christ figures.)
After three delirious hours the message is clear: Buy an ax, kill a lot of people, wear a kilt, show your butt, screw a princess and (if you have some time left over) repeat this over and over and over and over and over... until you get caught. If ever a movie cried out for a halftime break, this was it.
Ⅲ 一個英語電影的讀後感 要300字 讀後感是中文 電影隨便什麼
一、《功夫熊貓》
今天下午我們小記者班的同學一起觀看《功夫熊貓》。
這部電影的主人公是一隻普普通通的熊貓。主要演義著這只熊貓通過自己的信心，浣熊師傅的信任，勤勞、刻苦的練習功夫，遇到困難不輕易放棄，最終練出一身好功夫打敗了太郎。影片贊揚了這只熊貓相信自我，不輕易放棄，勤勞刻苦的奮斗精神。
在這部影片中給我印象最深的畫面還是浣熊師傅在廚房發現熊貓只要有了食物，就會實現它原本不可能實現的事。浣熊師傅就利用食物了引導它學功夫。這一畫面，給我的印象特別深。我深深的體會到浣熊師傅的用心良苦。師傅它以引食學功夫的方法來刺激熊貓學功夫的興趣，熊貓也知道這是激起它學功夫的興趣，但它沒有放棄，而是更加勤奮和刻苦的堅持學下去。熊貓的這種不屈不撓的奮斗精神永遠留在我的心中。同時我也從熊貓這種精神中想到自己的親身經歷的一件事。
那是一年寒假，媽媽認為我寫日記方面很欠缺，便讓我每天寫一篇日記。我聽後十分不情願，每次三言兩語就沒了下文，最後徹底放棄了寫日記，現在想起來都有些慚愧，與功夫熊貓中的主人公不能相比。
通過觀看功夫熊貓，我明白了這些道理，世上沒有不可能的事，凡事都要相信自己，遇到困難不要輕易放棄機會，在以後的學習上，時時牢記《功夫熊貓》這部電影，以影片中的主人公為榜樣，認認真真的走好每一步，爭取成為一名對社會有用的人。
二、《藍精靈》
前天，我懷著興奮的心情去觀看3D版電影-——《藍精靈》。戴好3D眼睛，我迫不及待地坐到了位子上。
故事是這樣開頭的。在一個很遠很遠的地方，有一座高山，山上有一個美麗的村子，村子裡無憂無慮地生活著九十九個精靈男孩和一個精靈女孩，對了，還有一個精靈爸爸。突然有一天，禍從天降，壞蛋巫師格格巫為了收取藍色精華，要抓精靈孩子們。而我們的主人公笨笨，因為走錯了路，掉下了懸崖，幸虧，他的朋友們一個接一個，像猴子撈月似地拉住了笨笨。本來精靈、格格巫與笨笨之間沒有什麼關系，卻因為一個漩渦，把他們都吸進去，卷到了紐約，一個個精彩的、讓人捧腹大笑的故事就此展開……看著看著，我彷彿成了藍精靈中的一員，和笨笨他們一起想辦法，一起進攻，用雞蛋、刺球、乒乓球打倒格格巫，平安回到精靈村。直到影片結束，我還沉浸在故事當中。
看完影片後，我從心底里佩服笨笨。他雖然很頑皮，做下許多錯事，但他知錯能改，為了彌補自已的過錯，鼓起勇氣，和強大的格格巫作斗爭，設法偷取格格巫的魔法戒指，讓他失去法力，為最後戰勝格格巫出了一份力。另外，我也看到，一切的邪惡，貌似強大無比、不可戰勝，但只要我們不屈不饒、團結一心、堅持戰斗，終將被我們征服。因為，正義必將戰勝邪惡。
三、《國王的演講》
和影片的片名一樣，《國王的演講》一開始給人的感覺是波瀾不驚，和好萊塢大片的氣質相去甚遠，與去年奧斯卡最佳影片《拆彈部隊》對現代戰爭背景下的人性思考也十分不同。但波瀾不驚決不是清湯寡水，《國王的演講》彷彿一出內斂而精緻的戲劇，在低調中醞釀出深厚，在深厚中鋪展出令人動容的力量。
影片的故事情節非常簡單，取材於真實的歷史事件。英國國王喬治六世從小患有嚴重的口吃，最後，在萊昂納爾的治療下，終於克服口齒，發表了振奮人心的演講。這個簡單朴實的故事之所以會產生那麼大的戲劇張力，首先就是因為細小的事情發生在了重大的歷史人物和歷史事件身上。時值二戰，作為一國之象徵的國王，需要發表演講來凝聚人心。在這樣的背景下，口吃治療就變得尤為重要，細小的事情變得茲事體大。
國王能否被治好口吃，成為整部影片最大的戲劇張力，一直到最後，在萊昂納爾的"指揮"下，喬治六世終於完整進行了戰前演講，觀眾才會舒一口氣。影片的張力還來自於國王和治療師本身，這是兩個身份差距很大的人，一個是國王，一個只是普通的治療師，國王的性格不僅內向，還容易憤怒，總有居高臨下的氣勢。這種因為身份差異帶來的個性碰撞也成為影片的亮點。（勵志一生 www.lz13.cn）治療師萊昂納爾的角色在這個碰撞過程中顯得尤為出彩，他並沒有因為治療對象是國王而卑躬屈膝，他要求國王打破常規，到自己簡陋的治療室來接受治療，一副"我的地盤聽我的"的架勢，他用自己不卑不亢的耐心和誠懇，最終打開了國王堅固的心扉，找到了國王幼年的心理陰影。他甚至故意激怒國王，讓國王流利地說出罵人的話。而正是這種不卑不亢的真誠交流，讓萊昂納爾獲得了尊重，國王也把他當成了一生的好友。
Ⅳ 求一篇阿甘正傳的300詞左右的英文觀後感要求有中文解釋
《阿甘正傳》觀後感（英文）
To be honest, this is the first time I ever write a review of a movie. And this beginning is a tough one—with an Oscar winner as its subject, surrounding which there is considerably controversy over the values it has questioned, the thoughts it tried to implicitly convey, and the art of the movie itself.
Forrest Gump mould incarnation of virtue is honest keeping one』s word , conscientiously , brave paying attention to motioning among film. In the film, Forrest Gump is a very pure image, but Jenny has become the degenerate symbol . And write the great discrepancy originally in this. To all that narrated, since beginning all behave with a kind of tender feeling and well-meaning attitude after all for the film, having even joined poesy composition, this makes the film seem soft and have no injury. The film advocates to traditional moral concept and embodiment. Make film apt to accept by people, director superb lay out skill and film application of language make the film very attractive too. Success with commercial for film content of the film has given security, and the treatment on director』s art makes the film more excellent, this is reason that the film succeeds. It was the box-office hits the most in that year to become U.S.A. in < Forrest Gump>.
《阿甘正傳》影評
阿甘是一個出生很不幸的人，通常人們總是認為這種人不能成功， 在做任何事情過程中。 但是，相反，這個不幸的人已經取得許多難以置信的成功，他是一個足球明星，一名戰爭英雄和一個百萬富翁！
阿甘在影片中被塑造成了美德的化身，誠實、守信、認真、勇敢而重視感情。在影片中，阿甘是十分純潔的形象，而珍妮則成了墮落的象徵。這與原著有著極大的出入。對於所敘述的一切，影片自始自終都是以一種溫情和善意的態度來表現的，甚至還加入了詩意化的成分，這使得影片顯得柔和而無傷害性。影片對傳統道德觀念的宣揚和體現。使影片變得易為人們所接受，導演高超的編排技巧和電影語言的運用也使影片十分吸引人。影片的內容為影片商業上的成功提供了保證，而導演藝術上的處理也使得影片更加精彩，這就是影片成功的原因所在。《阿甘正傳》成了美國當年最為賣座的電影之一。
Ⅳ 《阿甘正傳》英文讀後感，300字，不要太難
There are so many amazing incidents in my life which can』t be happen if I have the power to forecast the future.
To Forrest Gump, who was born with intellectual disturbance and muscle problem in his leg, he never imagined that he could become a famous American football player, a war hero and even a millionaire. Forrest won dignity and respect though his strive and perseverance.
I believe I can make a better life for those I love though my own effort. Have a little faith for your life. Let』s enjoy our life everyday with dignity, honesty, braveness and love just like Forrest Gump!
整部電影最讓我感觸最深的一句話就是「生命就像一盒巧克力，結果往往出乎你的意料。」
是的，生活充滿了不確定性和難題。對一些人來說，他們希望自己擁有預測未來的能力。因為他們可以為迎接機遇和挑戰做足充分准備，甚至可以提前知道彩票的幸運數字。
但對於我來說，我實在不希望擁有這樣的「能力」。生活本就神秘莫測，每個人都有他自己的道路。生日時收到同學送來的禮物或是在另外一個城市遇到老朋友時的驚喜都讓我十分地享受。在我的生活中有許多令人驚喜的小插曲，假如我有預測未來的能力，它們就都不會發生了。
對阿甘來說，他出生時有智力障礙和腿部的肌肉問題，他從沒想到過自己竟然能夠成為橄欖球運動員、戰爭英雄和百萬富翁。他通過自己的努力奮斗和不屈不撓贏得了尊嚴和別人的尊重。
我相信我能通過自己的努力讓我愛的人們過上更好的生活。讓我們對自己的生活有一些信心，讓我們就像阿甘一樣，在尊嚴、誠實、勇氣和愛中，享受每一天的生活！
Ⅵ 英文電影觀後感中文300字
鮮艷明亮的色彩運用，仿若一本童話書的打開方式，使這部動畫在第一時間便足以吸引孩子的矚目，電影講述了不開心的博啃族只有吃了樂天的精靈族才能開心，因此每年都會舉行吃精靈的美食節，而精靈族國王為了改變這樣的命運，帶著所有族民逃離了精靈樹，開始了新的生活，但隨著時間的推移，精靈族也放鬆了警惕，肆無忌憚的狂歡終於又引來了博啃族，為了營救被抓走的精良族，公主波比和另類不喜歡樂的布蘭開始了這段拯救同伴的旅程。
當故事伊始，過於低幼的展開，令我錯以著這是一部如斯皮爾伯格《圓夢巨人》般只是獻給孩子的作品，但隨著劇情的推進，老歌新唱的方式使電影所洋溢的快樂逐漸的開始也能感染著大人，而極具現實的隱喻，更能為人心生共鳴，這根本不是一個淺顯的童話故事那麼簡單，電影在令人收獲快樂的同時，更在授人以漁的啟迪著每一個大人如何面對生活的態度。
孩子是最不缺乏快樂的，真正失去快樂的是已經長大的成人，從這一點來說《魔發精靈》的出發實則也是一部獻給大人的童話寓言，我們在面對生活種種問題壓力的同時，其實很多時候早已遺忘了快樂這項最為基本的能力，還自以為這是一種心智的成熟，實則電影所塑造的博啃族並不是什麼醜陋的怪物，而就是我們自己，必須食用精靈才能快樂的錯位認知，包括不斷壓抑自我的布蘭，又何嘗不是很多人現實中自身的寫照。
正如電影中那句令我映像深刻的歌詞「真實的色彩如此美麗」，笑對生活，回歸真實其實並不困難，我們或許無法改變這個世界必然存在的陰暗，但卻可以決定自己是活在陰暗中鬱郁寡歡的博啃族，還是生活在陽光下美麗樂天的魔發精靈。