励志英文电影观后感300字

『壹』 励志电影《决战冰河》观后感

[励志电影《决战冰河》观后感]励志电影《决战冰河》观后感作者：励志一生励志电影《决战冰河》观后感昨天看了一部励志类的电影《决战冰河》，励志电影《决战冰河》观后感。电影里的主人公威尔从一个默默无闻的乡村小伙子到全美国人追捧的对象，在这背后又隐藏着什么呢?我愿意为大家分享我的感受：电影的英文名叫IronWill，直接翻译成中文就是钢铁般的意志，其实看过之后才知道这还是英雄的主人公在公众心目中的名字，到电影的最后IronWill成为了一个符号，一个象征美国精神的符号，象征梦想和信念的符号。Will只是一个18岁的少年，但是他却以顽强的意志征服了所有人，包括我们这些电影观众。电影展现给我们的第一个镜头是威尔与火车赛跑。他从小就有一个明确的目标--参加狗拉的雪橇队并拿第一。他的家境不是很好，正在这时他收到了一封大学录取通知书，学费是他们不能承担的。他的父亲为了能让他读大学报了狗拉的雪撬队比赛，如果获得了第一名就能拿到一万元的奖金。但是不幸的事情发生了，父亲在一次训练中经过一条狭窄的冰河时掉进了水流湍急的河里，为了不让儿子也跟着掉下去他毅然地砍掉了雪橇链子。父亲死了，从那以后威尔消沉了好长一段时间，在这段时间里他迷失了方向，模糊了自己的目标。家里要债的逼得急，母亲情急之下商量着卖掉农场。正在这时威尔看到了父亲留下的报纸--狗拉的雪橇队比赛。他顿时豁然开朗明确了自己的目标，为了实现父亲的遗愿保住农场以及上大学他说服了母亲。威尔的叔叔在训练他时说了一句很经典的话"你没有足够的实力和经验与别人比，你唯一能够争取的就是时间和毅力。比赛的第一天只能睡五小时，第二天四小时…最后一天不睡觉。当别人在睡觉时你在跑，这样才有机会获胜。不管别人有多出色，只要相信自己做到更好就行。"威尔牢记叔叔的话，带着毅力参赛。参加比赛的都是些来自各个国家的名人，刚开始没有人瞧得起他，因为没有钱交迟到的罚金而不能参加比赛，在一位记者的帮助下他才获得了这个机会，观后感《励志电影《决战冰河》观后感》。在强大的对手和恶劣的天气下威尔没有放弃，在威胁和诱惑下他没有放弃。(班主任工作www.banzhuren.cn)他克服了重重困难，始终牢牢记住了叔叔的话"相信自己，相信自己的狗，当你很难做出决定时把自己交给上帝吧，上帝会帮你的！"在路途中他救了一个对手，他那颗善良的心感染了许多人。他每天都以铁人威尔的名字上报纸的头版新闻，全美国人都在为他喝彩，许多人还到现场为他加油，他是全美国的英雄和希望。当对手用卑鄙的手段将他的狗弄伤后他没有放弃。这时他的目标远远超过了去获得一万元的奖金，而是金钱以外的东西；他参加比赛远远不是代表自己一个人，而是代表全美国，全美国都在期待着他的好消息。最后那一刻最让人感动：他实在是太疲惫了，快到达终点的时候他倒下了，眼看着后面的对手追了上来，人们都在为他加油。这时是他的毅力支撑着他，他没有放弃，艰难地爬了起来完成最后的使命。曾经没有一个人预料到他会坚持到终点，事实证明那些人都错了，威尔不但到达了终点而且还拿到了第一名，他的毅力震撼了在场的每一个人。他不但完成了父亲的遗愿保住了农场获得了上大学的资金而且成为了全美国人知晓的英雄。看了这部影片后我深深的敬佩威尔，他真的是一个了不起的英雄。他有一个明确的目标并为这个目标而奋斗，不管中途遇到多少艰难险阻他都没有放弃，靠着他的信念坚持到最后。年仅十八岁的他怎能与强大的对手比呢，他有的仅是时间，所以在别人睡觉的时候他在跑，就是靠他的毅力坚持到最后。在这一点上我们与他又何尝不是一样呢。也许我们没有别人聪明，也许别人做同样一件事只需要花我们用的一半的时间，为了打败对手拿到第一我们只有多花点时间，在别人睡觉的时候我们在学习，这样我们才会立足于不败之地。几乎我们每个人都有梦想，只是容易被惰性消磨，我们每天为日常琐事疲于被命，而忽视了我们的梦想。人人都期待成功，但成功往往只属于那么几个人，这是为什么呢?因为只有那么几个人有坚强的毅力和顽强的信念，他们不但有梦想而且还有决心，虽然在前进的途中会遇到许多尴尬甚至是困难，但是他们没有放弃心中的信仰，目标唯一，决心坚定。到了某一个时候你所追求的远远不是你最初的梦想，而是超越梦想的那些更有价值的东西，这才是真正的成功。路在你自己的脚下，只不过看你自己怎么走罢了！转发请注明本文链接地址：空间完美搬家到新浪博客！〔励志电影《决战冰河》观后感〕随文赠言：【人生舞台的大幕随时都可能拉开，关键是你愿意表演，还是选择躲避。】

『贰』 英文电影观后感中文300字

鲜艳明亮的色彩运用，仿若一本童话书的打开方式，使这部动画在第一时间便足以吸引孩子的瞩目，电影讲述了不开心的博啃族只有吃了乐天的精灵族才能开心，因此每年都会举行吃精灵的美食节，而精灵族国王为了改变这样的命运，带着所有族民逃离了精灵树，开始了新的生活，但随着时间的推移，精灵族也放松了警惕，肆无忌惮的狂欢终于又引来了博啃族，为了营救被抓走的精良族，公主波比和另类不喜欢乐的布兰开始了这段拯救同伴的旅程。
当故事伊始，过于低幼的展开，令我错以着这是一部如斯皮尔伯格《圆梦巨人》般只是献给孩子的作品，但随着剧情的推进，老歌新唱的方式使电影所洋溢的快乐逐渐的开始也能感染着大人，而极具现实的隐喻，更能为人心生共鸣，这根本不是一个浅显的童话故事那么简单，电影在令人收获快乐的同时，更在授人以渔的启迪着每一个大人如何面对生活的态度。
孩子是最不缺乏快乐的，真正失去快乐的是已经长大的成人，从这一点来说《魔发精灵》的出发实则也是一部献给大人的童话寓言，我们在面对生活种种问题压力的同时，其实很多时候早已遗忘了快乐这项最为基本的能力，还自以为这是一种心智的成熟，实则电影所塑造的博啃族并不是什么丑陋的怪物，而就是我们自己，必须食用精灵才能快乐的错位认知，包括不断压抑自我的布兰，又何尝不是很多人现实中自身的写照。
正如电影中那句令我映像深刻的歌词“真实的色彩如此美丽”，笑对生活，回归真实其实并不困难，我们或许无法改变这个世界必然存在的阴暗，但却可以决定自己是活在阴暗中郁郁寡欢的博啃族，还是生活在阳光下美丽乐天的魔发精灵。

『叁』 励志电影观后感300字左右，不要太多300字就行了

《肖申克的救赎》毫无疑问是一部好片子，没有动作,没有特技,甚至没有美人，却依然能深深打动观众,并且历经十几年而魅力不减。它靠什么吸引我们？

有人说是因为它反映出了“人性之韧”。确实，用一把小榔头，近20年的时间，在人身控制极为严格的法西斯式监狱，挖出了一条逃生的小隧道（或许叫敲凿出了一条小隧道更合适，那个榔头实在太小了）。这难道不是体现了人的韧劲吗？

不过我觉得这个情节明显是戏剧化的，这只是导演在情节安排上的需要，这样的结尾只是为了反映安迪的“自我救赎”最终成功了，否则整个情节和主题难以为继。所以有人认为，《肖申克的救赎》反映的其实是“希望”对于人是多么宝贵。是的，片中直接讲到希望的地方就有很多。比如安迪在逃狱后给瑞德的信中所说的：“Remember， Hope is a good thing， maybe the best of things and no good thing ever dies。” 或许这正是作品和导演想告诉我们的。“Fear can hold you prisoner， Hope can set youfree。”这句话已成名言。

对我来说，《肖申克的救赎》打动我的地方不仅于此。

先说说我对影片中人物的看法。一个鲨堡监狱，里面的囚犯和官员，似乎是我们这个社会的众生相。

典狱长诺顿高高在上，平时道貌岸然，对圣经倒背如流，实际上攫取利益时不择手段，残酷、阴险而贪婪。狱警长海利和其他警员，凶狠残暴，充当诺顿的打手，草菅囚犯的人命。他们是不是象极了我们现实中的掌权阶层？我称之为鲨堡这个“小社会”的统治者。

囚犯中也有不同。除了主人公安迪之外，瑞德（Morgan·Freeman）当然是关键人物，我认为他是整部影片的线索：其实，整部电影中对白不多，影片很多想展现的东西都是通过瑞德的独白说出来的，其中多半都是瑞德对鲨堡生活的反思总结和他对安迪的解读。

瑞德是一个睿智的人，他在鲨堡混得非常好，犯人们的需求“没有他搞不到的”。他的智慧也洞悉了鲨堡生活的本质，他对安迪说：“在鲨堡，希望是一个危险的东西”，这是智者之言。放在我所处的环境中，人们一定会说“瑞德同志非常成熟老练”云云。但是，和现实中的那些所谓“智者”一样，尽管瑞德看清看透了鲨堡的本质，但他没想过去抗争，更不用说是影响和改变别人，他只是顺应鲨堡的规则以求自保。直到安迪出现，改变了他，并最终引导他走向了自由彼岸。

汤米，影片主要人物中最晚到鲨堡的，他和安迪一样，对生活充满希望，并在安迪的帮助下为之努力，可是他年轻幼稚不懂自保，结果在即将获得成功的时候，因为知道了安迪被冤的真相而被诺顿和海利谋杀。

博格斯三姐妹，瑞德说他们是“禽兽”，是鲨堡这样一个环境中“培养”出来的鸡奸狂，我们可怜的主人公安迪数次惨遭其毒手。博格斯他们虽然不是鲨堡统治者的一分子，但他们是统治者威胁其他囚犯的工具。在汤米被诺顿和海利谋杀之后，安迪拒绝为诺顿洗黑钱，诺顿就曾以此威胁。但博格斯最终也是因为欺负安迪，影响了诺顿和海利们的贪污而被打成废人。

当然还有图书管理员布鲁克斯，这是最让我震撼的一个角色。老布的一生，深刻反映了“体制化”下人的一生。在鲨堡度过了大半辈子，终于被假释，获得了自由，可一旦离开了熟悉的环境、熟悉的人，他感觉不到自己的价值，找不到自己的位置，他有了身体的自由，但其实他的灵魂早已被鲨堡扼杀，属于他自我的世界已经被压缩到了最小。最终他只能选择从这个已经完全不属于自己的世界消失。为什么要安排老布这样一个人物呢？我觉得导演是想告诉我们，如果没有安迪出现，老布就是瑞德和其他绝大多数囚犯们的未来。他是不是也象我们现实生活中许许多多人的未来呢？

而安迪（Tim·Robbins），我们的主人公，他是一个真正的人。“It takes a strongman to save himself，and a great man to save another。”瑞德可以说是一个“Strong man”，而安迪则是一个“Great man”，他救赎的不仅是自己，他也尽一切努力拯救囚犯们的灵魂。实际上整部影片关于他挖隧道逃生的情节是惜墨如金，以至于安迪逃走那一幕让我感觉相当突兀，这说明神乎其神的逃狱并不是影片的主题。而且瑞德告诉了我们，安迪在挖好地道之后并没有立刻逃走，他最终离开是因为汤米的死让他看清了诺顿们的残忍无情，看清了自己并没有能力救赎其他的囚犯。也就是说，尽管安迪已经做好了逃狱的准备，他也没有马上逃走，虽然他有拥抱自由的极切渴望——在他逃出鲨堡之后站在小河里拥抱风雨的那个俯视镜头相信观者都会印象深刻——但他仍然留在鲨堡帮助那些“无希望的人”。影片主要就是在这方面进行描写，我想这也是影片叫《肖申克的救赎》而不是《安迪·杜佛瑞的救赎》的原因。

安迪利用自己的特长为诺顿们洗钱，为囚徒们争取着不多的权益和精神空间，比如当安迪头一次利用理财特长为海利做事时，所要求的只是让海利请难友们喝酒，他自己不喝，微笑着看着瑞德和赫伍他们喝，别人都不懂安迪为什么这样做，瑞德明白，因为那一刻安迪让他自己和别人都享受到了自由的感觉。

再比如建设监狱图书馆、教汤米识字和帮助他考试等等。而我印象最深刻的，是他利用监狱广播为众人播放《费加罗的婚礼》那一幕，那个情节非常恰当地体现出，安迪的救赎确实对鲨堡众囚颇有意义，而安迪也是一个真正的救赎者。特别是，当诺顿和海利们站在门外向安迪发出警告的时候，安迪却面带微笑地把留声机的音量调到了最高——可怕的惩罚就在门外，但是安迪没有退缩。这是真正的勇者！一个伟大的人！以至于我有这种感觉，安迪来到鲨堡压根就不是作为囚犯去的，而是作为救赎者去的。

写到这，可以回答以下问题了：《肖申克的救赎》到底是什么如此打动我？又为什么如此打动我？

首先，是“institutionalizing”对人性的摧残。片中多处对此有篇幅或长或短的提示。长的如老布这个角色，短的如瑞德的只言片语，他在假释后，不用向谁报告请示就能WC了，但他甚至因此而不习惯，“一滴尿都挤不出来”。再有象其他犯人，对于安迪所做的事，比如让海利甘心请犯人喝啤酒，放歌剧给犯人听，甚至每一个和狱方对话的情景，都是其他犯人津津乐道的谈资，他们觉得安迪的所作所为真是难以想像的。这样的情节，让人想起了鲁迅先生的作品。

其次，我认为这部电影主要就是在回答“面对‘institutionalizing’应该怎么办？”这个问题，而作者把所有我认为正确的答案集中在了安迪身上。有四点：
首先，对人生要保有希望，永远不弃。前面说到了，安迪在逃狱后给瑞德的信中说：“Remember， Hope is a good thing， maybe the best of things and no good thing ever dies。”还有一个情节我也觉得说明了这一点，再进鲨堡的前几年，安迪遭到莫格斯三姐妹的十几次毒打和轮奸，但是在这样的黑暗生活下安迪并没有沉沦，他能做到，唯一的解释就是，安迪心中获得救赎向往自由的信念在不断的给予着他希望。（连理想和希望都没有的人，只是一堆行尸走肉，不管他富可敌国还是贫无立锥。）
其次，要有足够的勇气。安迪首次面对海利时；面对莫格斯们的侮辱时；特别是为犯人们播放歌剧时，做这些事中的每一件都面对着生死考验，但他毫无惧色，没有勇气怎能做到！（有理想而无勇气，那这理想几乎等同于无。）
第三，要有坚持行动的毅力。用一把可以藏在书中的小榔头，用近20年时间凿出一个逃向自由的隧道，没有毅力是绝对不行的。此外，坚持六年如一日的写信给州议会争取拔款，为犯人们建图书馆也是片中着墨较多的反映这一点的情节。（没有毅力和恒心的人，最高的成就只能是梦想家。）
第四，就是要有行动的智慧。这一点不必多说，相信看完全片，你会在心里赞一声安迪的才华和智慧。他的计划宏大而完美，安迪之所以能完成救赎并处罚诺顿与海利们，靠的正是他的智慧。（有勇气、有毅力，却没有智慧，那最终的结果往往并不是成功而是挫折和失败。理想仍然可望不可及）
短片结束的时候，我清晰的记得片尾有一行字幕“In memory of Allen Greene”（纪念艾伦格林）他是《肖申克的救赎》编导弗兰克.德拉邦特的经纪人，在影片完成的前夕死于AIDS的并发症。生前的他和无数的女人在一起过，也有过子女，但是他一辈子都没有结婚，据说他的欲望强到离开伊藤猛鬼就没法活的地步，我想这也是他过于混乱的的生活才会死于艾滋吧。

1994年的奥斯卡太强了，《低俗小说》、《四个婚礼一个葬礼》、《阿甘正传》、《肖申克的救赎》……如此之多的强片。《阿甘正传》最终成为最佳影片，但如果让我选择得奖者，我更钟意《肖》片。因为，我认为《阿》片固然好，但更多是体现了美国的社会特点和美国人的价值理念，换句话说，它更像一部美国的“主旋律”影片。而《肖》片，它所反映的“体制化”（institutionalizing）问题，对于中国社会更有意义。我对影片中的那段话，“Thesewalls are kind of funny like that：First you hate them，then you get used to them，Enough time passed，get so you depend on them。That'sinstitutionalizing。”，极有共鸣——这个可怕的过程正是我一直以来极力避免的。我不是生活在监狱中的囚犯，但我是不是其他某种形式的囚犯呢？救赎对我而言，恐怕也不能只是说说而已。

『肆』 一个英语电影的读后感 要300字 读后感是中文 电影随便什么

一、《功夫熊猫》

今天下午我们小记者班的同学一起观看《功夫熊猫》。
这部电影的主人公是一只普普通通的熊猫。主要演义着这只熊猫通过自己的信心，浣熊师傅的信任，勤劳、刻苦的练习功夫，遇到困难不轻易放弃，最终练出一身好功夫打败了太郎。影片赞扬了这只熊猫相信自我，不轻易放弃，勤劳刻苦的奋斗精神。
在这部影片中给我印象最深的画面还是浣熊师傅在厨房发现熊猫只要有了食物，就会实现它原本不可能实现的事。浣熊师傅就利用食物了引导它学功夫。这一画面，给我的印象特别深。我深深的体会到浣熊师傅的用心良苦。师傅它以引食学功夫的方法来刺激熊猫学功夫的兴趣，熊猫也知道这是激起它学功夫的兴趣，但它没有放弃，而是更加勤奋和刻苦的坚持学下去。熊猫的这种不屈不挠的奋斗精神永远留在我的心中。同时我也从熊猫这种精神中想到自己的亲身经历的一件事。
那是一年寒假，妈妈认为我写日记方面很欠缺，便让我每天写一篇日记。我听后十分不情愿，每次三言两语就没了下文，最后彻底放弃了写日记，现在想起来都有些惭愧，与功夫熊猫中的主人公不能相比。
通过观看功夫熊猫，我明白了这些道理，世上没有不可能的事，凡事都要相信自己，遇到困难不要轻易放弃机会，在以后的学习上，时时牢记《功夫熊猫》这部电影，以影片中的主人公为榜样，认认真真的走好每一步，争取成为一名对社会有用的人。

二、《蓝精灵》
前天，我怀着兴奋的心情去观看3D版电影-——《蓝精灵》。戴好3D眼睛，我迫不及待地坐到了位子上。
故事是这样开头的。在一个很远很远的地方，有一座高山，山上有一个美丽的村子，村子里无忧无虑地生活着九十九个精灵男孩和一个精灵女孩，对了，还有一个精灵爸爸。突然有一天，祸从天降，坏蛋巫师格格巫为了收取蓝色精华，要抓精灵孩子们。而我们的主人公笨笨，因为走错了路，掉下了悬崖，幸亏，他的朋友们一个接一个，像猴子捞月似地拉住了笨笨。本来精灵、格格巫与笨笨之间没有什么关系，却因为一个漩涡，把他们都吸进去，卷到了纽约，一个个精彩的、让人捧腹大笑的故事就此展开……看着看着，我仿佛成了蓝精灵中的一员，和笨笨他们一起想办法，一起进攻，用鸡蛋、刺球、乒乓球打倒格格巫，平安回到精灵村。直到影片结束，我还沉浸在故事当中。

看完影片后，我从心底里佩服笨笨。他虽然很顽皮，做下许多错事，但他知错能改，为了弥补自已的过错，鼓起勇气，和强大的格格巫作斗争，设法偷取格格巫的魔法戒指，让他失去法力，为最后战胜格格巫出了一份力。另外，我也看到，一切的邪恶，貌似强大无比、不可战胜，但只要我们不屈不饶、团结一心、坚持战斗，终将被我们征服。因为，正义必将战胜邪恶。

三、《国王的演讲》
和影片的片名一样，《国王的演讲》一开始给人的感觉是波澜不惊，和好莱坞大片的气质相去甚远，与去年奥斯卡最佳影片《拆弹部队》对现代战争背景下的人性思考也十分不同。但波澜不惊决不是清汤寡水，《国王的演讲》仿佛一出内敛而精致的戏剧，在低调中酝酿出深厚，在深厚中铺展出令人动容的力量。

影片的故事情节非常简单，取材于真实的历史事件。英国国王乔治六世从小患有严重的口吃，最后，在莱昂纳尔的治疗下，终于克服口齿，发表了振奋人心的演讲。这个简单朴实的故事之所以会产生那么大的戏剧张力，首先就是因为细小的事情发生在了重大的历史人物和历史事件身上。时值二战，作为一国之象征的国王，需要发表演讲来凝聚人心。在这样的背景下，口吃治疗就变得尤为重要，细小的事情变得兹事体大。

国王能否被治好口吃，成为整部影片最大的戏剧张力，一直到最后，在莱昂纳尔的"指挥"下，乔治六世终于完整进行了战前演讲，观众才会舒一口气。影片的张力还来自于国王和治疗师本身，这是两个身份差距很大的人，一个是国王，一个只是普通的治疗师，国王的性格不仅内向，还容易愤怒，总有居高临下的气势。这种因为身份差异带来的个性碰撞也成为影片的亮点。（励志一生 www.lz13.cn）治疗师莱昂纳尔的角色在这个碰撞过程中显得尤为出彩，他并没有因为治疗对象是国王而卑躬屈膝，他要求国王打破常规，到自己简陋的治疗室来接受治疗，一副"我的地盘听我的"的架势，他用自己不卑不亢的耐心和诚恳，最终打开了国王坚固的心扉，找到了国王幼年的心理阴影。他甚至故意激怒国王，让国王流利地说出骂人的话。而正是这种不卑不亢的真诚交流，让莱昂纳尔获得了尊重，国王也把他当成了一生的好友。

『伍』 初一学生励志电影读后感不少于60词用英语写

Last night,I saw a great film,Forrest Gump.I am greatly impressed by this film,by the stories of Forrest Gump.Forrest Gump was born in a small village.He was born mentally retarded,and he was discriminated by others.But his mother is a strong female who encourages Gump to be strong and live the same as normal people.Besides,he meets Jenny,a tragic but kind-hearted girl.With the love of his mother and Jenny,Forrest Gump begins his running all his life.

『陆』 求三篇英文电影的观后感 用英语写（30词）

电影《阿甘正传》观后感：

Last night,I saw a great film,Forrest Gump.I am greatly impressed by this film,by the stories of Forrest Gump.Forrest Gump was born in a small village.He was born mentally retarded,and he was discriminated by others.But his mother is a strong female who encourages Gump to be strong and live the same as normal people.

《阿甘正传》是由罗伯特·泽米吉斯执导的电影，由汤姆·汉克斯、罗宾·怀特等人主演，于1994年7月6日在美国上映。

电影改编自美国作家温斯顿·格卢姆于1986年出版的同名小说，描绘了先天智障的小镇男孩福瑞斯特·甘自强不息，最终“傻人有傻福”地得到上天眷顾，在多个领域创造奇迹的励志故事。电影上映后，于1995年获得奥斯卡最佳影片奖、最佳男主角奖、最佳导演奖等6项大 。

2014年9月5日，在该片上映20周年之际，《阿甘正传》IMAX版本开始在全美上映。

『柒』 求勇敢的心观后感一篇，英文的，300字左右

1
Wags enjoy razzing the 13th-century Scottish epic Braveheart, starring Mel Gibson in the role of freedom fighter William Wallace, as Die Hard in a kilt. Wait till they get to the knobby question of how Gibson's knees stack up against Liam Neeson's in Rob Roy. No matter. Gibson gets the last laugh. Braveheart resists glib categorization. This rousing, romantic adventure is laced with sorrow and savagery. The audacity Gibson shows as the film's director extends to the running time, which is nearly three hours. Hamlet, with Gibson playing the melancholy Dane, was shorter, and Braveheart isn't Shakespeare. Don't panic. Though the film dawdles a bit with the shimmery, dappled love stuff involving Wallace with a Scottish peasant and a French princess, the action will pin you to your seat. With breathtaking skill, Gibson captures the exhilaration and horror of combat in some of the most vivid battle scenes ever filmed.
Wallace was knighted for leading his people in the fight against domination by England. Few facts are known about his personal life, which frees Gibson and screenwriter Randall Wallace (no relation) to run with the legend passed down mostly from the rhyming verse of a poet known as Blind Harry. It's a shame that Harry predates Hollywood by five centuries -- he could have made a killing cranking out kick-ass crowd pleasers.

Gibson's Wallace is a potent blend of Robin Hood, Attila the Hun and, yes, the wags were right, Detective John McClane in Die Hard. Wallace could relate to any story that pits one pissed-off fighter against the system. He faced an English army led by bad-to-the-bone King Edward the Longshanks, played by Patrick McGooban in a classic portrait of slithering sadism. Wallace also had to inspire Scottish peasants and nobles to follow his lead against daunting odds.

It's a ripping yarn, and Gibson could have slid by with the usual hack heroics. Kevin Costner's Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves did just that and still earned a pile. Gibson does it the hard way with attention to detail. He has retained the keen eye for character he showed in The Man Without a Face, his promising 1993 directing debut. Wallace doesn't spring to life as a full-blown legend, though he does speak Latin and French when he returns to his village in Scotland to settle down as a farmer and marry Murron (the meltingly lovely Catherine McCormack), his childhood sweetheart. It's the brutal fate dished out to Murron by the English that makes the farmer an outlaw.

That's when Wallace organizes the villagers into a ragtag militia. Brendon Gleeson's Hamish, James Cosmo's Campbell and Alun Armstrong's Mornay register strongly, as does David O'Hara's Stephen, the Irish warrior who joins the Scottish cause. The teasing camaraderie botched in Robin Hood is expertly handled here. Gibson's impassioned performance as the hero who would not trade his freedom for English gold doesn't shrink from showing the barbarian who emerges at a call to arms.

"Are you ready for war?" Wallace shouts to his outnumbered troops at Stirling. It's the film's first major battle scene and a triumph for Gibson. Trying to stir hundreds of fatigued soldiers to action, Wallace rides his horse back and forth in a frantic effort to be heard. In most historical films, the stationary star manages to move multitudes with a throaty whisper. Gibson jettisons the Hollywood fakery. Riding among the men, his face streaked with woad (a blue dye used to terrify the enemy) and his voice hoarse from yelling. Wallace is a demon warrior crying out for vengeance.

Cinematographer John Toll, an Oscar winner for Legends of the Fall, thrusts the audience into the brutal frays at Stirling, York and Falkirk. Superbly edited by Steven Rosenblum (Glory), these sequences recall the blood poetry of Welles' Chimes at Midnight and Kurosawa's Seven Samurai. Sophisticated weaponry was centuries away. The Scots used hammers, axes, picks, swords, chains and even farm tools to crack skulls as they battered the English in the mud. They also set oil traps on the ground to burn their enemies, though shields and chain mail offered scant protection against the rain of English arrows. "Quite the lovely gathering." says Longshanks, surveying the carnage and dispatching his officers to send in Irish volunteers instead of expert English archers. "Arrows cost money," he sneers.

Gibson's handling of Wallace at war is so thrillingly done that one regrets the subplots that distract from the action. Wallace's flirtation with the king's French daughter-in-law, Princess Isabelle (Sophie Marceau), is fanciful fluff that undercuts his undying love for Murron, and the king's homophobic revenge on his preening son, Prince Edward (Peter Hanly), and the son's boy toy, Phillip (Stephen Billington), comes off as inexplicable gay ting. Judicious cutting might have sharpened the film's focus and impact.

Still, don't get your kilt in a bunch over a spectacle that provokes such lively debate about the method and madness of war. Filmed with furious energy and surprising gravity, Braveheart takes the measure of a hero with a taste for blood to match his taste for honor. Wallace is an inspiring, unsettling role, and Gibson plays him, aptly, like a gathering storm.

2
Braveheart is an action/drama movie about William Wallace (Mel Gibson). The film is no less than amazing in any way. Though the movie sports us with a 177 minute run time, it is amazing to see the interesting way in which, Mel Gibson behind the camera, works his magic. As the acting is magnificent, and the war sequences are brutal and violent, the film works out as a movie which will always be remembered as a classic.

The film focuses on William Wallace, growing up as a kid, his father was a fighter. After his death, his uncle took him in to watch over him, and teach him how to fight. When he is older though, he meets Murron MacClannough(Catherine McCormack). After he weds with her, she is murdered. Now avenging her death, William sets out ot fight for his freedom, his justice and the right to live.

Mel Gibson did really an amazing job on capturing the character of William Wallace. Putting on the Irish accent, he shows us that he is a great actor and can do some things which we never thought he could do. Behind the camrea though, Mel is a completely different kind of person. He captures the fight scenes perfectly and beautifully. The one thing that was done well though, was the greatly realistic violence and brutal warfare of the film. The violence is spilled nicely, and realistically.

3
Braveheart is another film directed by its star, Mel Gibson. Close on the heels of Rob Roy, this is the second tribute to a legendary Scottish hero, this time round William Wallace, the great medieval warrior leader. Though less clever than its predecessor, it is much grander in its nearly three-hour epic sweep.

The obvious comparison is with Henry V (the Olivier, not the Branagh), and even though Randall Wallace may not be quite so good a screenwriter as Shakespeare, the movie can hold its own. Randall Wallace calls himself the spiritual descendant of William Wallace, and he has deftly incorporated the not many known facts about his namesake, and addressed the legend with gusto and eloquence. The result is an epic that, a few excessively romantic touches notwithstanding, is more realistic than most. These medieval Scots live in ferocious-looking hovels, seem (at least the men) heroically unwashed, and have coiffures in which a kestrel could nest. The friendly punches with which they communicate could easily kill a lesser fellow -- an Englishman, say. Braveheart aims to be a thinking man's epic. ``It's our wits that make us men,'' young William's da tells him, and, after da and big brother are killed by the English, Uncle Argyll continues the boy's ecation along similar lines. Pretty soon William has turned into Mel Gibson, a young man who wants to settle down and live in peace. But the English are making things hard, what with such things as ius primae noctis (in the film, more tersely but less correctly, the prima nocte) giving the English magistrate the right to deflower each lassie on her wedding night. Braveheartrending business, that. Finally William secretly marries the bonniest of lasses, Murron -- played by the breathtakingly beautiful and talented Catherine McCormack -- but the English get wind of it, and when she won't put out for them, slit her throat in a shattering scene irradiated by Miss McCormack's performance. So William turns avenger and, by one small further step, leader of the Scottish populace (as opposed to the nobles, suborned by Edward Longshanks, the Machiavellian English king). There are plots and counterplots as the nobles sabotage William's efforts, and Robert the Bruce, who wants to help him, is prevented by his leprous father (well played by Ian Bannen), who expects the nobles to crown his son king. And much, much more. The love scenes are so-so, the political scenes ho-hum, but the fighting -- both indivial contests and mass battle scenes -- is first-rate, barbaric, and sublime. You might think that so much battle stuff would pall after a while: how much slashing, chopping, stabbing, and skewering -- not to mention mangling and incinerating -- can there be without diminishing returns? Quite a bit; Gibson, to give him his e, comes up with new forms of warfare, better ways to turn charging men and horses into shishkebabs, new modes of battering down castle gates in a rain of boiling pitch from the battlements, fresh tricks to outsmart the enemy. And whereas this much violence with modern weapons would be unbearable, with medieval arms it becomes heroic and exhilarating. There is something appealing about Mel Gibson -- the ruggedly masculine countenance, the quick half-smile, the knack of conveying blue-eyed hurt (as when he discovers the Bruce under an enemy helmet), and a squarer-jawed determination than Dick Tracy's -- that sustains Braveheart even through the unlikely scenes with Isabelle, the Princess of Wales (indifferently played by Sophie Marceau), and through the Wallace's -- or the Gibson's -- unconvincing displays of polyglotism. Add to this the beauties of Scotland, searchingly chronicled by John Toll's inexhaustible camera, the solid supporting performances among which Patrick McGoohan's sardonic-sadistic Edward I is especially noteworthy (never before have terminal consonants been drawn out to such ironic length), and the intelligently deployed music by James Horner. A Scottish acquaintance, George Campbell, questions the use of the sweeter uilleann (Irish) bagpipes rather than the fiercer Highland ones ring the battle scenes, but these scenes are so exciting Horner could have used marimbas and I wouldn't have noticed. The film put me in mind of a four-line poem by Scotland's greatest modern poet, Hugh MacDiarmid: The rose of all the world is not for me. I want for my part Only the little white rose of Scotland that smells sharp and sweet -- And breaks the heart. And that is high praise.

4
What is there that can be said about Braveheart that hasn’t been said before? It’s an epic movie that ought to be in the conversation about the best films of the past thirty years. And actually, “epic” might be too small of a word. Braveheart is as much about the inner drama of William Wallace as it is about the life-and-death drama of the war for Scotland’s independence in the late 13th, early 14th centuries. It’s a story told on a grand scale with a great deal craft – and flair (and humor). This is a movie that offers both style and substance. It’s a direct precursor to the success of the Lord of the Rings movies – indeed, one can argue that the success of Braveheart set the stage for those films. True, Braveheart may not have universal appeal in terms of genre, story, or its brutal portrayal of war. But there can be little doubt of the value of a film that is, simply, one of the best I have ever seen.

The success of the film rests on the balance with which the story unfolds. Put simply, there’s something here for everyone: romance, action, character, philosophy, conflict, cinematography, great lines, music, and so on … and it all fits together almost flawlessly. I’m sure if you looked hard enough you could find fault with some parts of the movie, but considering its nearly three-hour run time it manages to avoid pitfalls remarkably well.

This is William Wallace’s story. And through him, the audience is allowed a mirror with which to view itself. This is the true measure of a great story: its ability to not only provide commentary, but also to provoke introspection. And that happens here quite often. One of the film’s most quoted lines is “Every man dies, not every man really lives.” Within just those seven words there is a great deal of thought and sentiment. It encapsulates a philosophy, a raison d’être, that anyone can immediately identify with. And it’s a beautiful philosophy – like carpe diem. And it encourages us to find the purpose and meaning within our lives on a daily basis.

This is also a love story, between William Wallace and Murron – a childhood friend. Theirs is a story that flows effortlessly from childhood tragedy and bonding, to althood romance and marriage. Indeed, it is Murron’s murder that proves to be Wallace’s motivation to launch his personal war against England whose king, Edward ‘the Longshanks’ is portrayed with a powerfully brutality in the film, making him a very compelling villain.

Wallace’s quest is joined by a cast that is quite adept in their roles. There are hardly any weak links in the acting of this movie, which means that the underlying themes and conflicts are portrayed to maximum effect from start to finish. Mel Gibson’s directing certainly has to be credited for some of that success.

This is, without question, Gibson’s film. And it’s not without a certain part of vanity from the lead actor and director. If you were looking for a critique, this would be the most fertile ground for it. But for the most part, whatever vanity Gibson may have been displaying is overshadowed by the craft of everything else. The action is riveting, the dialogue is crisp (and profound) and the music is deeply, deeply moving.

James Horner’s score successfully taps into the heritage of Scotland while displaying a full orchestral presentation. The instrumentation and arrangements are all very well done, from wavering flute to the bagpipes to the thunderous percussion ring battle sequences.

5
I used to think that the history of Scotland around the end of the thirteenth century was one of those really complicated and messy affairs that could send any historian into a fit of sobbing. So imagine my surprise as I discovered it's really all about a bunch of rowdy guys mooning each other across a battlefield and then playing dodgeball.

"Braveheart" is one of those audacious films that implies that war is "bad" by putting the violence at the forefront, slowing it down and tossing in lots of extra blood, piercings, stabbings, castrations, amputations and assorted mutilations with random insertions of Mel's butt -- just to make sure that the women get into it too. This is all topped off by a really long and protracted moment where the camera lovingly dotes on Mel Gibson as he is taken to a platform to be tortured. It's the kind of moment that makes preschoolers point to the screen and say, "Christ figure! Christ figure!" Either that or: "Look! He's shamelessly grooming himself for the Oscars!" (Oscar committees love Christ figures.)

After three delirious hours the message is clear: Buy an ax, kill a lot of people, wear a kilt, show your butt, screw a princess and (if you have some time left over) repeat this over and over and over and over and over... until you get caught. If ever a movie cried out for a halftime break, this was it.

『捌』 壮志凌云英文观后感

英文：

The film shows the technology aircraft and its flight ability.

In the past two hours, the pilots flew the fighter F-14 and the relatively old A4 and F5 in the blue sky and white clouds for an hour and a half.

Those glittering fighters chased and formed each other, sometimes roaring overhead.

sometimes floating smoothly at an altitude of 10000 meters, accompanied by lofty mountains and rivers and magnificent dawn and afterglow.

All kinds of scenes were very good, and the pilots in the cabin were nervous and sometimes playful dialogue, which made the audience feel immersive.

The film not only attracts many weapon fans, but also is very attractive to the general audience.

中文：

影片表现了科技航空器及其的飞行能力，近两个小时中飞行员们驾驶战斗机F-14和相对老旧的A4、F5急驰在蓝天白云中的镜头却足足占了一个半小时。

那些银光闪闪的战斗机相互追逐，相互编队，时而从头顶呼啸而过，时而平稳地浮游在万米高空，伴以崇高的山川和壮美的晨曦、余晖。

各种情景都很好，还有机舱中飞行员们那时而紧张时而俏皮的对话，使观众有以身临其境之感，正是如此，该片不仅吸引了众多兵器迷们，对一般观众而言，它也是极具诱惑力的。

剧情：

麦德林是一名美国海军飞行员，以自己来飞行员父亲为偶像，与同是海军军官的古斯一起被派到高炮训练基地接受最严格的训练。

在一次训练中，因机器故障导致古斯离他而去，麦德林意志消沉甚至想离开军队，然而在教官的劝说下放弃这一念想并在最后的考核中终于奋起，驾驶银鹰，纵横蓝天，最终成为一名优秀飞行员。

『玖』 5篇100字左右的英文电影的观后感，要用英语啊

《阿甘正传》观后感：

To be honest, Ive never seen anyone like Forrest Gump in a movie before.Forrest Gump who is unfortunately to be born with a lower IQ and the muscle problem, usually, people always think this kind of person cant be successful in doing anything. But, instead, this unlucky man has achieved lots of incredible success, he is a football star, a war hero, and later a millionaire!

Forrest Gump not only shares his innocence and purity with others, ,he also manages to retain that innocence through some very difficult times. I love Forrest that he doesnt lose his purity through the movie, or maybe he just cant ,but either way, this shows us dont need to be evil or really intelligent to be recognised or successful.

It is just a movie, so maybe it doesnt work like that in reality.A simply means is that the acting and story of this film got a high level like the real . And in my definition thats what a good movie should be able to do.

译文

老实说，我以前从未在电影中见过像阿甘那样的人。阿甘不幸地天生智商较低，而且有肌肉问题，通常人们总是认为这种人做任何事情都不会成功。但是，相反，这个不幸的人取得了许多令人难以置信的成功，他是一个足球明星，一个战争英雄，后来成了百万富翁！

阿甘不仅与他人分享他的纯真和纯洁，他还设法在一些非常困难的时期保持这种纯真。我喜欢福勒斯特，因为他没有在电影中失去他的纯洁，或者也许他就是不能，但不管怎样，这表明我们不需要邪恶或真正的智慧才能被认可或成功。

这只是一部电影，所以在现实中可能不是这样的。一个简单的方法是这部电影的表演和故事达到了真实的高度。根据我的定义，这就是一部好电影应该能做到的。

『拾』 英语电影观后感(100字)

在我看过的所有影片中,《肖申克的救赎》是最能打动我的一部影片。特别是剧中的男主人公在一个风雨交加的黑夜，冲破监狱的围墙越狱成功后，伸出双臂拥抱自由的经典画面，更是深深的震撼着我的心灵。这是对自由的渴望，更是对生命的致敬！
影片《肖申克的救赎》一般被认为是一部励志片。但是，在我看来，它不仅仅是一部励志片，更是一部探讨生命，自由以及人处于逆境中所迸发出来的超乎想象的潜能的影片。
影片故事集中发生在一个叫肖申克的监狱中，四面都是高墙栅栏，只有抬头仰望天空时，才会发现外面还有另一个世界。主人公因为法庭的的误判而被监禁在这里。或许，许多观众都会认为主人公的后半生都会在这里度过了。对于监狱里的其他犯人来说，这里或许就是他们以后的归宿。他们好像已经接受了命运的安排，整天就是打架，赌钱，丝毫不在意大墙内外的不同世界。在他们的内心深处，已经不存在监狱这堵墙了。他们已经放弃了对生命和自由的渴望，但是，对于主人公来说，他没有放弃……
起初，主人公表现的与其他犯人没有两样，只是一直比较沉默寡言。然而，不再沉默中爆发，就在沉默中灭亡。孰知这长久的沉默是为那最后瞬间的爆发而积蓄着巨大的能量。主人公凭借自己的聪明才智给监狱长洗钱而受到重用，而后又坚持每周给监狱上级写信，要求拨款在监狱建图书馆。在坚持了几年的每周写信后，监狱上级终于同意拨款建图书馆。就这样，主人公一步一步，悄无声息的实施着自己的计划，终于在一个雷雨交加的黑夜，主人公终于冲破了监禁他20年的监狱.。当监狱长看到那幅画底下的那个大窟窿时，一切都真相大白了。观众无不为主人公的聪明智慧所折服，真是大快人心！
20年的时间足以摧毁一个人的意志，消磨一个人的耐心。但是，影片中主人公却没有被时间所摧毁，却显示出了更强的生命斗志。当人处于逆境中时，人的潜能到底有多大，谁也不知道。但是，当你对生命和自由有强烈的渴望和追求时，积聚在你内心深处的巨大潜能就会迸发出来，这就是生命的力量，让我们向生命致敬！
可能有点长，你再删减一下！！